Recent comments in /f/Futurology
smokebomb_exe t1_jcaithr wrote
Reply to comment by CocoDaPuf in What can a ChatGPT developed by a well-funded intelligence agency such as the NSA be used for? Should we be concerned? by yoaviram
Correct, the divisive political memes from Russia and China I mentioned in a reply here
dberis t1_jcai5b7 wrote
Reply to What can a ChatGPT developed by a well-funded intelligence agency such as the NSA be used for? Should we be concerned? by yoaviram
No need to worry, we'll all be redundant in 5 years anyway.
sinsaint t1_jcahoj3 wrote
Reply to comment by CocoDaPuf in What can a ChatGPT developed by a well-funded intelligence agency such as the NSA be used for? Should we be concerned? by yoaviram
And until republicans started scraping for votes by turning the uneducated into a cult using meme-worthy propaganda.
Drag queens, hating responsibilities, and prejudice against anything a rep thinks is 'woke'. It'd be comical if it wasn't so effective.
And before it was that, it was Trump telling everyone a bunch of lies they wanted to hear, all while using the presidency to advertise his buddy's canned beans in the Oval Office.
Other countries didn't make us crazy, the crazies just didn't know who to vote for before.
Overall_Warning7518 t1_jcafmxp wrote
Reply to comment by Tetondan in Will AI Replace Programmers? by Charlotte_D_Katakuri
The issue with that argument is that the abstraction language is regular old English / human, so at some point nearly everyone will be capable of “programming”. No need for a dedicated programming profession
CocoDaPuf t1_jcafic7 wrote
Reply to comment by smokebomb_exe in What can a ChatGPT developed by a well-funded intelligence agency such as the NSA be used for? Should we be concerned? by yoaviram
>Americans are dividing themselves
That's where you're wrong, Americans were not dividing themselves this much until nations started directly influencing the public conversation.
Edit: I also don't want to imply that I think American agencies aren't conducting their own AI driven disinformation and "public sentiment shaping" campaigns. That's certainly a thing that is happening. If anything the US has a larger incentive to use AI for that, as here it would be much harder to keep the kind of programs China and Russia use under wraps, the "troll farms" which are like huge call centers for spreading misinformation, anger and doubt.
boukatouu t1_jcadbso wrote
Reply to comment by Hizjyayvu in What are some jobs that AI cannot take? by Draconic_Flame
I was thinking of something more human like, walking, taking. It would be expensive, no doubt, but the price would come down, and used models would make their way onto the market. You don't honestly think that people frequent prostitutes for human interaction, do you? They want sexual experiences not available to them in their current relationships or lack thereof.
NoDetail8359 t1_jcacoaw wrote
Jobs where the thing you do is a side dish to the legal liability you shoulder by being the one doing it.
I expect delivery people to do surprisingly well on account of mad max raids against a person carrying a package being a lot more problematic than vandalizing a drone.
Hizjyayvu t1_jcaa96v wrote
Reply to comment by boukatouu in What are some jobs that AI cannot take? by Draconic_Flame
Sex dolls are just glorified masturbation. You can't honestly think that will replace human to human sex. Everyone can masturbate yet still billions of people fuck eachother and always will.
[deleted] t1_jcaa7fr wrote
Reply to comment by MamaMiaPizzaFina in What are some jobs that AI cannot take? by Draconic_Flame
[removed]
LaFlibuste t1_jca9szs wrote
In general, I'd say jobs that are about caring for others and providing support. Like nurses and care givers. Will robots eventually be able to help with a lot of the more menial and physical side of the work? Absolutely. But the one thing they will never be able to replace is hunan warmth.
[deleted] t1_jca8y00 wrote
[removed]
[deleted] t1_jca83d0 wrote
Reply to comment by Exotic-Foundation119 in What would you like to see for the future of cell phones? by ItsOk2PeeSittingDown
[deleted]
flejbus t1_jca7szj wrote
For the cell phones not to be big bricks if plastic and metal we have to carry around.
But most of all, to see them not be tracking devices of our lives to use against us, but rather tools for us to achieve things we are not capable of in our current state.
3lisaB t1_jca79w4 wrote
I think (at least for now) the turnover is between people without AI versus people with AI (& ability to learn/ unlearn fast)
Specialized AI is getting impressingly good at context but it will probably take long to fine tune generalization and categorization at the right titers as a nuanced human understanding can.
ExaBast t1_jca3p43 wrote
Reply to comment by OralGuyD in What would you like to see for the future of cell phones? by ItsOk2PeeSittingDown
The screen uses most of the battery
hazyheadd t1_jca2m19 wrote
Reply to comment by great_healthy_cook in What are some jobs that AI cannot take? by Draconic_Flame
But soon enough AI will be able to design AI hands and bodies and then we'll build them for them
sunrise_speedball t1_jca2c3t wrote
Reply to What can a ChatGPT developed by a well-funded intelligence agency such as the NSA be used for? Should we be concerned? by yoaviram
It can go a lot. Nothing that wasn’t already being done. When the government adopts stuff like this, it’s to re-align manpower—not revolutionize the industry.
So the AI will do jobs that people used to do, those people will be repurposed to other assignments.
Government works different.
[deleted] t1_jc9y2h7 wrote
Reply to comment by Chaos-Spectre in What would you like to see for the future of cell phones? by ItsOk2PeeSittingDown
[deleted]
nobodyisonething t1_jc9y07t wrote
Reply to comment by orange_keyboard in What are some jobs that AI cannot take? by Draconic_Flame
Plumbers and electricians are fine and will be fine for longer than most office workers.
ColonelSpacePirate t1_jc9xd7i wrote
Reply to comment by nobodyisonething in What are some jobs that AI cannot take? by Draconic_Flame
It can’t pump out a shitter
MallFoodSucks t1_jc9wo1q wrote
Reply to comment by Newhereeeeee in What are some jobs that AI cannot take? by Draconic_Flame
Nothing. Google has PALM, Meta has FLAVA, Amazon has AlexaTM/CoT, every major tech company has been working on LLM and multimodal models for years. OpenAI was always the benchmark, but the major tech companies are not that far behind - maybe 2-3 years at most. The parameters race has been escalating for awhile now at a rapid pace, so these models were always going to get to this level soon once they scaled sufficiently and had proper training data.
What GPT did better than anyone, was make it a Chatbot. It showcased the power of AI to normal people who don't understand ML. They're also much better at cleaning their data and scaling their model than companies who are more focused on specific business use cases than generic knowledge models.
Hotchillipeppa t1_jc9uhag wrote
Reply to comment by AlisherUsmanov in What are some jobs that AI cannot take? by Draconic_Flame
Gpt4 hallucinates 30% less than chatgpt v2
Mercurionio t1_jc9ufyx wrote
Reply to comment by BeWiseExercise in What can a ChatGPT developed by a well-funded intelligence agency such as the NSA be used for? Should we be concerned? by yoaviram
Once it starts to pop up, internet call centers will become less popular, since people will start to look at the goodies before buying them. Not all, but many.
Any shit can, and will, spiral out of control
kaminaowner2 t1_jc9tfyw wrote
Good idea, but that would mean less money so it’s not gonna happen. Cross your fingers and hope that ether true AI is for some reason not possible or true AI is very friendly towards human life. Both of those are big ifs
hxckrt t1_jcaiwx4 wrote
Reply to comment by Dziadzios in What are some jobs that AI cannot take? by Draconic_Flame
Then you're still missing the safeguards for them harming others, and those can be very, very hard to separate