[removed]

Patient journals are also stored in the cloud for easy access: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vastaamo_data_breach

[removed]

Chuck E Cheese already has done that.

you should see my chatgpt chat history.

However, every second message it says to find a real therapists. so unless we are dealing with another AI that is trained to pretend to be a therapist and not suggest finding one. therapist might not be in as much danger.

However if there is a chat AI that is trained to pretend to be a therapist. and will not suggest contacting a real one. imagine the lawsuit and bad press as soon as one of their users (probably a few so maybe a class action lawsuit) commits suicide. imagine the parents and families with the chat history scrutinizing every chat log and blaming it for what happend.

Compromise, humans will write AI ethics and AI will write human ethics

I am feeling much better now. im in a better place, I have been in a process of learning healthy coping mechanisms, like not delving on my mistakes, appreciating my relationships, standing up for myself, and sending bitcoin to XX69L££T420XX.

[removed]

> judgment to intervene and take proportional action when there is an immediate threat to someone's life

Recently I've read a post of someone who was suicidal but refused to go get help to specifically avoid this. It might actually be a feature.

I am not so negative. Sure, it is something like statistical plagiarism. On the other hand, I have seen it perform clever word-plays that I do not think exist in its training material. After it generalizes from many examples, it displays fluidity in association and capabilities that are quite remarkable for what it is.

Much of what we do today involves working on a computer, consuming digital media and producing digital output. I am going to just claim that all of that is amenable to AI. We were all completely wrong in predicting what programs could do -- it turns out that the most important thing is simply affordance. If it is data that computer can read, then it can do something with it.

Much of what we think that is intelligence appears to be barely better than that plagiarism that you decry. I mean, work we do is typically just about doing repetitive tasks every day which are similar to what you did before, and applying known formulas you have been taught or learnt by experience to new problems. I am afraid that human creativity will not turn out to be all that different form machine creativity.

Finding hard unsolved problems, breaking off a small piece of one of them, and coordinating all of the resources and people necessary to solve it.

Other than that? Finding a niche as a fine craftsperson in an industry that’s already been “automated”, but handmade goods still command a premium if they’re any good. I personally know people in jewellery, furniture and textiles. It’s a long, hard road, but it’s durable.

Humans don't really understand humans either.

Most phone cameras do pick up infrared light -you can test this by pointing a remote control at the camera and pushing buttons. Cat phones s61 has built in FLIR.

Don't worry, they already have it (or something similar)

You'll soon see mental health startups have their own chatbot, capable of answering and understanding queries really well.

Special Education teacher, but I would LOVE to use AI to help with keeping data.

The problem is that there is no such thing as an uninterested third party who is human or even of this world. The only reasonable uninterested this party would be an ET.

But if it actually were so, wouldn't it automatically mean it's fully in line with physics and we simply don't know enough about physics to understand it?

Part computer science. Part philosophy. All trying to appease our new AI overlords.

The current approach to AI requires large digital training data. So it can only do tasks where both input and output are digital. Apart from that, robotics are evolving very slowly in comparison. So anything that requires dexterity in a non completely standadised task is save. Cleaning tables, plumbing, laying tiles, repairing traffic lights, etc.

You’re deluding yourself. AI will move into your field and take over, just like everywhere else.

LLM's and just AI-systems in general have been used by intelligence agencies well before ChatGPT came along. At scale, and in coordinated, find-grained, and concerted fashion across society in ways that would shock almost anyone. Should we be concerned? I mean, relative to all the other shit going on in our lives? I guess?? It's the sort of stuff that makes us ineffectual at putting up a coordinated defense against fucked up government policies, so sure, but OTOH there's just so much shit going on right now that in the same breath, well, meh.

Probably the same as any other org. Debugg that code that is no longer working and was written by a dude who is no longer employed.

There are no jobs safe from AI. Artificial intelligence will figure out how to do everything and anything that humans can do and do it better. And I wonder if that scenario is a lot closer than we think.

what sort of job is that exactly?