Recent comments in /f/Futurology
x0JohnSmith0x t1_jc500u4 wrote
Reply to comment by Bewaretheicespiders in Will AI Replace Programmers? by Charlotte_D_Katakuri
It’s a hammer for now, until the hammer grows legs, can recognize nails and wood and feel the need to build houses
wizardsfartfire t1_jc4zjjz wrote
No, according to all those Republicans, they will keep working just out of principle. So no worries. Let the jackasses carry the load. Just like always
Evipicc t1_jc4yc7z wrote
Reply to comment by TheLastSamurai in Now is the Moment for a Systemic Reset of AI and Technology Governance by lughnasadh
This is why we need a global economic overhaul but there's a lot of power voting against it.
FarCut2677 t1_jc4xm7k wrote
Reply to comment by speedywilfork in With a universal income, will we stop working? by berlinparisexpress
Shortages in labor won’t be a thing when robots do all the jobs, the creation of supply will be made by bots
Energylegs23 t1_jc4u3g8 wrote
Energylegs23 t1_jc4typk wrote
Reply to comment by Fishermansgal in Future Timeline has removed its prediction about a cure for Alzheimer's disease by 2036 by ixfd64
Association Between Consumption of Ultraprocessed Foods and Cognitive Decline
Yeah, seems plausible enough
Bulldogsleepingonme t1_jc4sx5n wrote
Reply to comment by Kelsey473 in Seems to me evolution found a solution to human obesity problem (Familial natural short sleep). Do you agree with my reasoning? by alex20_202020
well, they are thin- Plus 100 Points on tinder.
They dont sleep much... so more opportunity...
TheLastSamurai t1_jc4r93p wrote
This articulated quite clearly why I’m really pessimistic about this technology. If you have 100 units of wealth for 100 people and say 70 to to the top 10, what if you make 1000 units of wealth for that same number of people, more wealth right? Except here it will be 990/1000 to the top 5/100 people. Not exact terms but illustrating a concept. Not good.
HallPersonal t1_jc4qw3p wrote
Reply to comment by just-a-dreamer- in Will AI Replace Programmers? by Charlotte_D_Katakuri
professional programmers are mad. i code for fun so yeah it will def kill programming in the traditional sense
Traditional-Lion7391 t1_jc4mor3 wrote
Reply to comment by black_flag_4ever in Will AI Replace Programmers? by Charlotte_D_Katakuri
Are you a programmer?
Traditional-Lion7391 t1_jc4mksp wrote
Reply to Will AI Replace Programmers? by Charlotte_D_Katakuri
No, if anything it will make our jobs easier. Just another tool, probably also full of bugs
dudpixel t1_jc4ituj wrote
Reply to Will AI Replace Programmers? by Charlotte_D_Katakuri
Once ai can write its own code it isn't just game over for programmers. It's game over for everyone. An ai that can replace programmers can also code a better ai, and with enough evolution can program any software anywhere, including the software that powers every business in the world.
Anyone who imagines that programmers will lose their jobs but the rest of the world will keep going as normal...doesn't understand how much of the world runs on software.
Programming will be one of the last jobs replaced by ai.
In the meantime ai will provide more and more powerful tools to allow programmers to create more powerful software in less time. Hopefully with less bugs.
MorbidSloth t1_jc4cm0j wrote
Reply to comment by DeNir8 in Future Timeline has removed its prediction about a cure for Alzheimer's disease by 2036 by ixfd64
Nope. Nobody's ever tried that before.
[deleted] t1_jc48dm9 wrote
Desperate-Currency49 t1_jc47ehr wrote
Reply to comment by NickOnMars in Will AI Replace Programmers? by Charlotte_D_Katakuri
I’m currently asking it to convert bash scripts and rust with some cryptography to nodeJS scripts. If an extension could compile and run the results to validate whether they run that would be incredible.
[deleted] t1_jc40u41 wrote
Reply to Will AI Replace Programmers? by Charlotte_D_Katakuri
[removed]
mega_lova_nia OP t1_jc3t94y wrote
Reply to comment by LoveFearLearn in How is our general outlook for the future of digital and information technology? Are we heading towards a dystopia, utopia, or something in between? by mega_lova_nia
What about you? Do you have any predictions according to your observation of our current trends?
Sl0w-Plant t1_jc3q96m wrote
Yeah, that ain't happening. Anytime mankind reaches a turning point he always goes the wrong way so by that historical presidence I am looking forward to seeing a world going very wrong, including on the AI front...
thepenginsloth t1_jc3npua wrote
So tired of hearing about UBI. Someone somewhere still has to work to provide this. This only promotes apathy and no one will want work. This is why every UBI experiment has failed.
apeters89 t1_jc3m682 wrote
Reply to comment by ixfd64 in Future Timeline has removed its prediction about a cure for Alzheimer's disease by 2036 by ixfd64
Reminds of the Edison legend where he "found 1000 ways to not make a light bulb."
just-a-dreamer- t1_jc3jzz1 wrote
Reply to Will AI Replace Programmers? by Charlotte_D_Katakuri
Of course it will.
Probably faster than many other white collar professions. Why wouldn't it?
Tetondan t1_jc3fsem wrote
Reply to Will AI Replace Programmers? by Charlotte_D_Katakuri
What is a programmer? I would say in the most naive understanding of the term it is someone that inputs instructions for computers to perform. Who's to say that a Natural language isn't just another obfuscation on computer programming languages? As is, no programmer is writing raw machine instructions, we are all using languages built on top of each other (usually) multiple layers deep. I don't see current "AI" as being anything more than another abstraction.
3SquirrelsinaCoat t1_jc3dd42 wrote
Think tank papers serve a good role, and many of the points the author lays out are valid. Most of them actually. However, she's not really adding anything to what is already an ongoing discussion across many industries on precisely the points she makes. Big picture, yeah she's bang on. More immediate picture, what does a "reset" look like? How does one concoct a reset? Get all the fortune 500 together and ask them to sign a pledge? Move a piece of legislation through Congress? A year from now, we're going to have much more powerful versions of what is today already powerful. Laws are not equipped to address it (won't get passed anyway); industry guidelines are only as good as a company's word.
So part of my reaction this article, which again is good, is, "yeah, and? What's your plan?" Just repeating what everyone else is already discussing, even if eloquently phrased, comes up a bit short for a think tank.
TheRealDestian t1_jc39eib wrote
Reply to comment by alex20_202020 in Seems to me evolution found a solution to human obesity problem (Familial natural short sleep). Do you agree with my reasoning? by alex20_202020
That’s an advantage, yes, as needing only four hours sleep would help with many things, but it will take tens of thousands of years for such a trait to work its way into the general population.
SyntheticDreams_ t1_jc51chu wrote
Reply to comment by ConscienceRound in With A.i advancements. What are some skills everybody should be learning now to better live in the future? by Moon_Devonshire
AI generated content is pretty rapidly cranking out decent advice and emotional support, though. It wouldn't surprise me if the empathy professions begin to get phased out at least in part in the next few years. Especially roles like crisis line workers where it's entirely a support role without a clinical or diagnostic focus.