Recent comments in /f/Futurology

Masspoint OP t1_jbxa6ml wrote

well I had a conversation with chatgpt about the similarities between human intelligence and machine learning and it kinda said the same but if you look at how human intelligence develops it is actually quite similar, the major difference is in the programming and the sensory input, but also the processing power.

That creates vastly different results, and since it is not biological I would not consider it alive either, or have a soul so to speak.

But it terms of reasoning, it defenitely can reason and that is quite revolutionary. I wouldn't go as far to say it has awareness or consciousness, but it certainly produces something that look similar to the outside world.

In the mind itself , it's just bits and bytes though, meaning it's basically just a calculator, that's pretty much what any computer is, but this calculator is so advanced it can mimic a type of consciousness.

1

prionustevh t1_jbx9mii wrote

My point is there's nothing reserved for the Billionaires, Multimillionaires. Which is what most people think of when we talk about gene editing/longevity therapies in the future.

Yeah the people in poor countries will probably never afford it because they already lack basic Healthcare level unfortunately.

But alot of people in this sub act as if new advances in therapy will be only for Billionaires.

1

antellier t1_jbx924e wrote

I'm the furthest thing from knowledgeable about anything to do with computers really, but as far as I can tell, it seems like most people, not just the layman but the leaders in these industries and systems that are going to start incorporating it into their businesses and research practice, all seem to be struggling to treat AI with an appropriately objective attitude. I understand how big of a hurdle it is to accurately comprehend and predict the characteristics of distinctly non human consciousness because our frame of reference isn't comparable and we're the only ones making an effort to understand the consciousness of non humans.

I'm not just trying to criticize or bash anyone, I certainly don't have the ability to wrap my head around it, but I just can't imagine AI ever behaving and thinking in a way that would be reliably recognizable to us, kind of in the same way it doesn't make much sense to assume we'd be able to comprehend or relate to an Allen life form. One of the most popular alien theories is based around the idea that they would want to use us or our resources for something, but to me that seems like expecting birds and fish to want to ride people or build cars, only way further removed and unfamiliar.

Sorry I'm kind of rambling and a lot of this is probably real dumb, but it's the best I can muster lol

1

bakayen t1_jbx91h3 wrote

I would ask it to track my health and my mother's, making sure that we are always in a healthy state and that either of us can be alerted if something happens.

I would also have the assistant brain help me in finding new side-jobs since I do need the money. Would also have it plan out future things to learn and help me in taking up any hobbies like subsistence farming (it could automatically determine best way to plant, detect if there are any issues, and offer help).

Might also use it to help me write out the ideas I have for novels/fanfics/games. Once we get personalized AI, I have the feeling that customized games will be somewhat possible...

I will then ask it to help with being more sustainable in terms of energy and water usage. Help me with proper recycling too, since my country's disposal system is literal trash.

What would I call it? Probably would just name it Prosperity since that's what I wish for myself and everybody around me.

2

Masspoint OP t1_jbx5yil wrote

well it was just by accident, I have done iq tests in the past and I was wondering how it would score on it. At first I thought it was crazy smart, but when I made that numeric sequence it showed pretty quickly it isn't that smart.

Because it was able to recognize in other numeric sequences positions of numbers, so this should actually be a pretty easy numeric sequence.

It couldn't see it, but still, it was able to understand it when I explained it.

1

dgkimpton t1_jbx4kia wrote

For example https://www.swissinfo.ch/eng/sci-tech/fda-approved_novartis-s-new-475-000-cancer-drug-among-most-expensive-ever/43482544

Also, how do you square "upper middle class" with not being wealthy? I definitely consider them wealthy. Frankly even poor Westerners are wealthy beyond belief compared to a significant portion of the planet. Where do you draw the line?

Medicine/healthcare has always started by being available to those who could afford it, and eventually become more widespread. This is no different. It's insane to expect it to work any other way because the development costs have to be paid somehow.

1

kittensfly OP t1_jbx3xa8 wrote

Because we know so little about some of our underlying motives. I’d call mine ‘Specktor’ because it could listen to what others say, understand their perspective and present to me what they cannot present themselves. 👌

1

sorped t1_jbx2dts wrote

I like your ideas. Especially the first one is something I've given some thought in the last couple of years. If everybody had a pod they could sit in, and all pods were connected to a central AI managed network, everybody could go anywhere from their home, and would be able to use the transport time effectively, and everyone would be safe. So a central pod-network, a bicycle path-system and a pedestrian walk-system, all 3 of them seperated from each other, and everybody would be happy.

2