Recent comments in /f/Futurology
[deleted] OP t1_jb9xv9n wrote
[deleted] OP t1_jb9xspk wrote
khamelean t1_jb9xp7a wrote
Reply to comment by elidevious in I used to regularly trip acid in Shanghai with one of TikTok’s head data scientists. by [deleted]
“Honesty” and “truth” are very different things. One does not imply the other.
[deleted] OP t1_jb9xarj wrote
Jaded_Prompt_15 t1_jb9x9os wrote
Reply to comment by verifjah in I used to regularly trip acid in Shanghai with one of TikTok’s head data scientists. by [deleted]
One of many things that should clue people in to OP just making shit up
elidevious t1_jb9x6eb wrote
Reply to comment by 3SquirrelsinaCoat in I used to regularly trip acid in Shanghai with one of TikTok’s head data scientists. by [deleted]
I’ve found that’s when people are the most honest.
D_D t1_jb9x3dz wrote
Reply to comment by greenappletree in A group of researchers has achieved a breakthrough in secure communications by developing an algorithm that conceals sensitive information so effectively that it is impossible to detect that anything has been hidden by thebelsnickle1991
But if you encrypt information everyone knows there's information to be uncovered. Not every image you come across on the internet has hidden messages.
RabidBeaverLake t1_jb9wkjo wrote
Reply to comment by malk600 in I used to regularly trip acid in Shanghai with one of TikTok’s head data scientists. by [deleted]
Can you elaborate? How is this wrong?
I have no idea, I'm just genuinely curious. Watching other people use TikTok this statement would check out for sure.
3SquirrelsinaCoat t1_jb9vu2o wrote
Reply to I used to regularly trip acid in Shanghai with one of TikTok’s head data scientists. by [deleted]
While your story may be entirely true as you heard it, I take it as a good life rule to not put much stock in what people say while tripping.
zortlord t1_jb9vqmd wrote
Reply to comment by czl in A group of researchers has achieved a breakthrough in secure communications by developing an algorithm that conceals sensitive information so effectively that it is impossible to detect that anything has been hidden by thebelsnickle1991
>It is foolish to leave unaltered originals available if you are using stenography thus the comparison test you refer to can not be done in practice.
This is just steganography using media files.
verifjah t1_jb9v2k0 wrote
Reply to I used to regularly trip acid in Shanghai with one of TikTok’s head data scientists. by [deleted]
you even enter the country with acid and you’d probably be put in their prison camps for years 🧢
malk600 t1_jb9uwk3 wrote
Reply to I used to regularly trip acid in Shanghai with one of TikTok’s head data scientists. by [deleted]
> they knew the tech bypassed users’ prefrontal cortex playing to the limbic system
This I would classify as "not even wrong". Probably don't listen to people boastin ;)
[deleted] OP t1_jb9u06h wrote
greenappletree t1_jb9rxv4 wrote
Reply to comment by czl in A group of researchers has achieved a breakthrough in secure communications by developing an algorithm that conceals sensitive information so effectively that it is impossible to detect that anything has been hidden by thebelsnickle1991
Wouldn’t it be even safer to encrypt the orinal anyway and then obfuscate it with stengraphy?
Frequent_Neck7680 t1_jb9ruvf wrote
Reply to A group of researchers has achieved a breakthrough in secure communications by developing an algorithm that conceals sensitive information so effectively that it is impossible to detect that anything has been hidden by thebelsnickle1991
I like the steganography code where Damp Panties and Ken Fuckallnight are flirting with each other in the “Husband Home Alone” aol chat room while exchanging coded messages. Sometimes my life feels like I am being used as a steganographic element in a data stream between two aliens. Explains a lot.
pocketdare t1_jb9rnw1 wrote
I'm not sure why this would surprise anyone. There is no technology that any country's military or politicians would not consider weaponizing. It's just the way of the world - nations cannot afford to ignore technology that their competitors may be utilizing at their expense. Unless doing so is expressly covered in a treaty (e.g. chemical weapons)- and even then several nations will very likely still pursue it covertly.
This also by no means conflicts with an interest in developing the ability to counter the technology. Most nations will want to do both to enhance their own offensive capabilities while playing defense against others.
[deleted] t1_jb9rhje wrote
[deleted] t1_jb9rbzk wrote
Reply to comment by rherbom2k in U.S. Special Forces Want to Use Deepfakes for Psy-ops by rherbom2k
[removed]
tracerhaha t1_jb9q305 wrote
Reply to comment by sgfgross in Stanford Medicine scientists have found a way to transform cancer cells into weapons against cancer. by sgfgross
Sounds like it could possibly have applications beyond just cancer.
SarahMagical t1_jb9ozpy wrote
It’s going to be hard enough for technologically advanced cultures to adapt to a world with AI and deepfakes etc. Imagine how much harder it will be for some “developing” cultures around the world.
I keep thinking of boomers’ stereotypical ineptitude with basic technology that younger generations take for granted, and remote first-contact tribes that think taking a picture will steal their soul, and even object permanence issues in small children.
The brave new world is/will be such a massive paradigm shift for so many people. The struggle will be real.
FuturologyBot t1_jb9o1sz wrote
The following submission statement was provided by /u/rherbom2k:
The government wants to use deepfakes offensively despite claiming to develop tools to counter them. This can undermine trust in all content and erode democracy. As technology advances, people will continue to use it maliciously. The impact of deepfakes can be disastrous, causing society to lose trust in institutions and government. The future looks bleak as we must create ethical guidelines and educate the public to counter disinformation and promote transparency.
Please reply to OP's comment here: https://old.reddit.com/r/Futurology/comments/11kzbq7/us_special_forces_want_to_use_deepfakes_for_psyops/jb9kta5/
FuturologyBot t1_jb9laed wrote
Reply to A group of researchers has achieved a breakthrough in secure communications by developing an algorithm that conceals sensitive information so effectively that it is impossible to detect that anything has been hidden by thebelsnickle1991
The following submission statement was provided by /u/thebelsnickle1991:
A breakthrough algorithm conceals sensitive information so effectively that it is impossible to detect that anything has been hidden, researchers said on Tuesday.
The system — which uses steganography instead of cryptology — is so secure it could allow vulnerable groups such as dissidents to communicate more safely with the outside world, they said.
It could also allow investigative journalists and humanitarian aid workers to communicate easier in some countries.
The algorithm may soon be used widely for digital communications, including social media and private messaging, the team led by the University of Oxford said.
Please reply to OP's comment here: https://old.reddit.com/r/Futurology/comments/11kywcq/a_group_of_researchers_has_achieved_a/jb9hvbf/
BernieEcclestoned t1_jb9l1nw wrote
Reply to A group of researchers has achieved a breakthrough in secure communications by developing an algorithm that conceals sensitive information so effectively that it is impossible to detect that anything has been hidden by thebelsnickle1991
It still has to be displayed on a screen though, and with something like Pegasus that's all they need
jazztaprazzta t1_jb9xwd9 wrote
Reply to I used to regularly trip acid in Shanghai with one of TikTok’s head data scientists. by [deleted]
I don't think any of this is true, but I still hope tiktok gets banned all over the World.