Recent comments in /f/Futurology
justanothermind666 t1_jb4rm61 wrote
Reply to comment by justanothermind666 in Artificial intelligence could soon be widely used to detect breast cancer — and may be more effective than doctors at doing so, study says by Gari_305
no me troleen :(
justanothermind666 t1_jb4rjjy wrote
Reply to Artificial intelligence could soon be widely used to detect breast cancer — and may be more effective than doctors at doing so, study says by Gari_305
Fuck artificial inteligence! i feel rejected like in my fucking life im a drug adict alright? (still more interesting than fb)
ailish t1_jb4ril5 wrote
Reply to Artificial intelligence could soon be widely used to detect breast cancer — and may be more effective than doctors at doing so, study says by Gari_305
That'll be cool since breast cancer runs in my family.
[deleted] t1_jb4rdqy wrote
ChronWeasely t1_jb4onro wrote
Reply to comment by ch4m3le0n in Artificial intelligence could soon be widely used to detect breast cancer — and may be more effective than doctors at doing so, study says by Gari_305
From the article it said this AI is at least as effective as radiologists, and far faster.
floofstar t1_jb4oi23 wrote
Reply to Artificial intelligence could soon be widely used to detect breast cancer — and may be more effective than doctors at doing so, study says by Gari_305
AI is soon going to do everything blah blah blah blarghh uhhhh pfffft!!
RhetoricalCracker84 t1_jb4o5qm wrote
Reply to Artificial intelligence could soon be widely used to detect breast cancer — and may be more effective than doctors at doing so, study says by Gari_305
As an AI language model, I am unable to detect breast cancer…
[deleted] t1_jb4nlmi wrote
epigenie_986 t1_jb4kdux wrote
Reply to comment by ch4m3le0n in Artificial intelligence could soon be widely used to detect breast cancer — and may be more effective than doctors at doing so, study says by Gari_305
We might need AI to do a pass, along with a radiologist. I found a lump, hand it imaged and dismissed by a radiologist. A different radiologist takes a look, decides to biopsy, it’s found to be cancer. If a computer can take a look and save time of two radiologists looking, I’m game. People make mistakes. It is what it is.
KingVendrick t1_jb4j6sm wrote
Reply to comment by Deepfriedwithcheese in Artificial intelligence could soon be widely used to detect breast cancer — and may be more effective than doctors at doing so, study says by Gari_305
you PROBABLY want to follow up on how well that Watson initiative did
neo6912 t1_jb4gipq wrote
Reply to Artificial intelligence could soon be widely used to detect breast cancer — and may be more effective than doctors at doing so, study says by Gari_305
ive seen this about 244720572 times in the past 6 years now
[deleted] t1_jb4f8xm wrote
OnerousSorcerer t1_jb4elbu wrote
Reply to At the time of its 2176 quadricentennial, what will American society and technology look like? by artofterm
Bold of you to assume anyone will be around at that point.
ch4m3le0n t1_jb4b7sy wrote
Reply to Artificial intelligence could soon be widely used to detect breast cancer — and may be more effective than doctors at doing so, study says by Gari_305
Most of this tech is currently not as good as a real radiologist. Detecting cancers is a lot harder than it looks, and is often not just based on the imaging, but a raft of other factors.
ch4m3le0n t1_jb4b4ia wrote
Reply to comment by hvgotcodes in Artificial intelligence could soon be widely used to detect breast cancer — and may be more effective than doctors at doing so, study says by Gari_305
Spoiler, it's not any more accurate than a rookie radiologist.
[deleted] t1_jb4avcj wrote
Darryl_Lict t1_jb49tuz wrote
Reply to comment by hvgotcodes in Artificial intelligence could soon be widely used to detect breast cancer — and may be more effective than doctors at doing so, study says by Gari_305
I thought that computer recognition of dangerous cancers was superior to human doctors years ago. Have the AI do the initial recognition then have a human doctor confirm it.
MD_House t1_jb47tgk wrote
Reply to comment by -Ch4s3- in Artificial intelligence could soon be widely used to detect breast cancer — and may be more effective than doctors at doing so, study says by Gari_305
That is correct, I was part of a team using a CNN to predict survival days of glioma patients but getting data is really really hard. And we also didn't get the amount of images we actually wanted.
[deleted] t1_jb47r6g wrote
Reply to comment by hvgotcodes in Artificial intelligence could soon be widely used to detect breast cancer — and may be more effective than doctors at doing so, study says by Gari_305
Yeah most major tech companies are researching this stuff.
[deleted] t1_jb46tev wrote
fripaek t1_jb46px5 wrote
Reply to Artificial intelligence could soon be widely used to detect breast cancer — and may be more effective than doctors at doing so, study says by Gari_305
angry boob fiddling doctor noises
My message in here was to short so I‘m artificially streching it. Auto-Bot-Mod won‘t know and you can simly ignore these words. I wish you all a fruitful week my dear Redditors.
[deleted] t1_jb46ku4 wrote
Dartiboi t1_jb45n29 wrote
Reply to comment by FunnyMathematician77 in Artificial intelligence could soon be widely used to detect breast cancer — and may be more effective than doctors at doing so, study says by Gari_305
Yeah that would definitely happen if you didn’t remove that from the image. It’s a pretty simple fix though.
FunnyMathematician77 t1_jb45cq5 wrote
Reply to comment by hvgotcodes in Artificial intelligence could soon be widely used to detect breast cancer — and may be more effective than doctors at doing so, study says by Gari_305
I remember hearing about some issue with cancer recognizing AI. The AI was trained to associate a "ruler" with cancerous growth, because images of malignant tumors usually have some scale ruler thing while benign ones don't I guess. I don't know how accurate that is, but it does seem possible.
Lydiafae t1_jb4rna6 wrote
Reply to comment by rogert2 in Artificial intelligence could soon be widely used to detect breast cancer — and may be more effective than doctors at doing so, study says by Gari_305
It also tracks that many doctors minimize or dismiss women's health issues. AI would prevent more of this bias, which would lead to more accurate health diagnostic metrics. Which I am all for given my personal experience.