Recent comments in /f/Futurology
[deleted] t1_jaouyim wrote
disembodied_voice t1_jaoupxt wrote
Reply to comment by R0ckMachin3 in Electric world that kicks out fossil fuels will cost less than combustion economy. 30TW of wind and solar PV will take 0.2% of earth's surface. by DisasterousGiraffe
I said "overall" carbon footprint. The operational carbon footprint reduction of EVs over gas cars vastly outweighs any increase in manufacturing emissions, leading EVs to have a lower net carbon footprint. It's the total carbon footprint that matters, not the footprint at any one stage.
kirpid t1_jaou0z4 wrote
Reply to comment by TerranPhil in What are some problems on which I can develop apps using the latest technologies. I want some ideas on projects by rare_redditor0
That’s what language models are best at.
x16x0r t1_jaossfs wrote
No-Wallaby-5568 t1_jaosebu wrote
Reply to With The Help Of AI, By When Will There Be Drugs That De-Ages Humans And Keeps Us Forever Young? by AnakinRagnarsson66
The leading cause of death is America is heart disease which is a lifestyle disease. It's well known how to avoid it, people just don't do it so people will continue to die.
6thReplacementMonkey t1_jaorhde wrote
Reply to comment by Ok_Hope_8507 in Electric world that kicks out fossil fuels will cost less than combustion economy. 30TW of wind and solar PV will take 0.2% of earth's surface. by DisasterousGiraffe
No, I'm suggesting a semi-global organized effort to delay or sabotage anything that leads to less reliance on fossil fuels. Semi-global in the sense that the people involved are from many different countries, not in the sense that everyone is in on it. It's probably the governments/royal families of a few petro-states (Russia, Saudi Arabia, etc), along with the people who own the big oil and coal companies, along with people who are heavily invested in those companies. It's not a conspiracy in the "secret criminal plot" sense, and more like an alignment along common interests that leads to some illegal behavior and a lot of unethical/anti-free-market/imperialist behavior. It's also not a conspiracy in the "nobody knows but us" sense, because some of the groups involved are pretty open about a lot of it (e.g. Koch Industries and the Heritage Foundation).
R0ckMachin3 t1_jaor8kl wrote
Reply to comment by disembodied_voice in Electric world that kicks out fossil fuels will cost less than combustion economy. 30TW of wind and solar PV will take 0.2% of earth's surface. by DisasterousGiraffe
If you don’t include the manufacturing of the batteries. If you include both the vehicle itself and the batteries, ICE vehicles take less emissions to produce.
Surur t1_jaoqurv wrote
6thReplacementMonkey t1_jaoqs7q wrote
Reply to comment by TopicRepulsive7936 in Electric world that kicks out fossil fuels will cost less than combustion economy. 30TW of wind and solar PV will take 0.2% of earth's surface. by DisasterousGiraffe
Once you understand the problem, you can more effectively solve it.
JustaGoodGuyHere t1_jaoqn1e wrote
Reply to What are some problems on which I can develop apps using the latest technologies. I want some ideas on projects by rare_redditor0
Make an app that overclocks a phone’s processor to generate heat so the phone becomes a hand warmer.
sharksnut t1_jaoqiei wrote
Reply to Electric world that kicks out fossil fuels will cost less than combustion economy. 30TW of wind and solar PV will take 0.2% of earth's surface. by DisasterousGiraffe
0.2% of the earth's surface is 394,000 square miles or 252 million acres.
x16x0r t1_jaoqcxa wrote
Reply to comment by Surur in Electric world that kicks out fossil fuels will cost less than combustion economy. 30TW of wind and solar PV will take 0.2% of earth's surface. by DisasterousGiraffe
Yes.. point being batteries barely make a dent in the grid in terms of energy supply.
Surur t1_jaonsfw wrote
Reply to comment by x16x0r in Electric world that kicks out fossil fuels will cost less than combustion economy. 30TW of wind and solar PV will take 0.2% of earth's surface. by DisasterousGiraffe
> People charge their EV's after midnight for better TOU rates.
And that will obviously follow the availability of energy. If electricity is scarce at midnight then it will be expensive, and if it's most abundant in the day the incentive time will change.
Futurology-ModTeam t1_jaong59 wrote
Rule 6 - Comments that are a distraction to discussion of futurology may be removed.
TopicRepulsive7936 t1_jaojy3w wrote
We can never throw holy water on the tiny demons that cause sickness. They are just too quick and small.
x16x0r t1_jaojnu1 wrote
Reply to comment by Surur in Electric world that kicks out fossil fuels will cost less than combustion economy. 30TW of wind and solar PV will take 0.2% of earth's surface. by DisasterousGiraffe
People charge their EV's after midnight for better TOU rates. Just look at the graph and tell me batteries can supply energy for EV's after midnight.
>you would know they typically charge in the evening, not night
I don't know about you, but in California utility rates are at least double during the evening compared to off peak hours (after midnight).
Surur t1_jaojg44 wrote
Reply to comment by x16x0r in Electric world that kicks out fossil fuels will cost less than combustion economy. 30TW of wind and solar PV will take 0.2% of earth's surface. by DisasterousGiraffe
> what do you think will be used at midnight for energy?
Not much energy as we will be sleeping?
If you are talking about charging cars, you would know they typically charge in the evening, not night, and that if our energy is mainly generated in the day, we could easily incentivise charging in the day also (e.g. by requiring chargers at parking spots).
x16x0r t1_jaojai0 wrote
Reply to comment by Surur in Electric world that kicks out fossil fuels will cost less than combustion economy. 30TW of wind and solar PV will take 0.2% of earth's surface. by DisasterousGiraffe
I'm talking about energy production, not voltage regulation. As more people own EV's and charge them at night, what do you think will be used at midnight for energy?
Surur t1_jaoiv86 wrote
Reply to comment by x16x0r in Electric world that kicks out fossil fuels will cost less than combustion economy. 30TW of wind and solar PV will take 0.2% of earth's surface. by DisasterousGiraffe
I am talking about voltage regulation, not supplying amps.
TopicRepulsive7936 t1_jaoid0n wrote
Reply to comment by 6thReplacementMonkey in Electric world that kicks out fossil fuels will cost less than combustion economy. 30TW of wind and solar PV will take 0.2% of earth's surface. by DisasterousGiraffe
Nice cup o' demoralization, thanx.
AssRug47 t1_jaoh846 wrote
Reply to Electric world that kicks out fossil fuels will cost less than combustion economy. 30TW of wind and solar PV will take 0.2% of earth's surface. by DisasterousGiraffe
The real problem is losses in power lines getting electricity to where it needs to be from where solar is viable. Also lots and lots of batteries on the grid for night time
x16x0r t1_jaogyjz wrote
Reply to comment by Surur in Electric world that kicks out fossil fuels will cost less than combustion economy. 30TW of wind and solar PV will take 0.2% of earth's surface. by DisasterousGiraffe
They're made to help the grid during peak hours (4-8 PM), not the entire night. Take a look at the chart.. It charges most of the day and outputs all of it's capacity by 8-9PM with peaks at most 3000 MW.
flameleaf t1_jaogboc wrote
I would hope so. RSS is the primary way I currently interact with it, Reddit included.
All of these apps and sites that require individual logins with individual tabs with individual notification systems are a mess. I can just get a feed, load it up with my reader of choice, and manage it on my own terms.
Ok_Hope_8507 t1_jaofv9j wrote
Reply to comment by 6thReplacementMonkey in Electric world that kicks out fossil fuels will cost less than combustion economy. 30TW of wind and solar PV will take 0.2% of earth's surface. by DisasterousGiraffe
So you're suggesting a global conspiracy to slowly produce renewables?
kirpid t1_jaow338 wrote
Reply to Does decentralized technology have a place in the future of the internet? by CherylHeppner
There’s a trade off. Centralization consolidates power. Decentralization distributes it.
For example, you could have a digital ID/passport that includes your drivers license, medical and financial information etc. It would be convenient, but you’d lose your privacy and would be more vulnerable. All of your security would be bundled into a central point of failure.
This isn’t even touching the conspiracy theories.