Recent comments in /f/Futurology

x16x0r t1_jaods0s wrote

Batteries cost a lot, require re-charging as they don't produce any energy and overall do not hold much capacity. Even Hydro has significantly higher energy output, but natural gas is used for most of the grid besides peak solar times.

Source - California's grid (yesterday)

−8

epSos-DE t1_jaoaz4a wrote

In 20 years by this rate.

The event was ling and detailed.

Mineral extraction is the limiting factor at this point.

The new modular architecture of Tesla car assembly is a technological step for the car industry. The electric cars will beat any gasoline car with such a modular body.

The issue again are minerals for the batteries. Their processing needs investments into new mining operations and refineries.

2

Regolithic_Tiger t1_jao5yzv wrote

That's contact water, dude. It's not supposed to be clean. they have those ponds to manage their water so it doesn't get released to the environment. They then take the water from the ponds (and TSFs) and run it through the treatment plant or some other form of treatment and then discharge it once it meets water quality guidelines.

1

Regolithic_Tiger t1_jao5qjb wrote

tailings storage facilities (TSFs) are what you're thinking of. Settling ponds are those that are specifically designed to settle out suspended solids. TSFs will often contain a pond on them, but much of the impoundment area is beach (with varying degrees of water content). what I'm getting at, is that TSFs are more solid than water, while settling ponds are more water than solid (AFAIK). Mining terminology is weird.

And yes, in some cases tailings are reprocessed when technology catches up. It's kind of hard to do though.

1

TheSensibleTurk t1_jao53vp wrote

I think us opining on this at this point in time would be like medieval scholars conjecturing about technology a millennia into their future.

My "headcanon" if it's an appropriate term here is that humans will eventually become post-humans and be a cat 5 civilization and we cannot even conceptualize what they might do. Who knows, maybe they'll tame time itself. Or maybe they already did and this is an ancestor simulation. Maybe if they're benevolent enough they'll even let us have an afterlife. Sky is the limit.

I mean, just think on the fact that a couple centuries ago the scientists of the day were concurring that mechanical flight was impossible or that women couldn't ride in a train without damaging their uteruses.

2

Knackered_lot t1_jao4qzv wrote

Solar doesn't create enough KVARs to power a grid sustainably. And forget about when, you know, night time.

Wind farms produce enough KVARs, but highly variable amounts of wind makes for an unreliable power plant.

I would love for us to be able to do all this, but it is not realistic.

−7

jimihughes t1_jao3giw wrote

Bypassed medical and health technologies that are safer and more effective then those in current use in our medical system. Topics include therapeutic devices utilizing electricity, magnetism, color and sound frequencies. Rare documents concerning the Royal R. Rife Microscope; the Rife microscope was one of the world's most powerful microscopes, which was built in the 1930s; Dr. Bjorn Nordenstrom shrinking breast cancer tumors using electricity; Dinshah Ghadiali and Spectrochrome color therapy; George Lakhovsky and his Multiple Wave Oscillator; Dr. George Crile and radiogens; Dr. Harold Saxton Burr and L-Fields; Strophanthin-G; Diapulse machine that was validated by more than twenty U.S. universities to accelerate wound healing more than twice normal speed and many more subjects.

https://www.amazon.com/Nothing-Happened-But-Make-Happen/dp/0578016877/ref=sr_1_1?crid=RA1P8PXW4069&keywords=and+nothing+happened&qid=1677790087&s=books&sprefix=and+nothing+happened%2Cstripbooks%2C145&sr=1-1

1

Longjumping-Tie-7573 t1_jao0lg0 wrote

Define 'treatment' in a way that removes the possibility of doing *anything* to improve autism symptoms, please. We already know that dietary changes can lessen the symptoms for some, so you're already wrong on that point.

​

Frankly, medical technology is pretty much the LAST area I'd say something is going to be impossible; mate.

6

Mickl193 t1_janycq3 wrote

One truly impossible thing is to answer this question. there is always a horizon behind a horizon we are simply moving borders of what we define as impossible. Defining anything as such is stupid for a simple reason - we don't know everything, if you don't even know what you don't know how can you say that sth is not possible, in 50 years today's impossible may be trivial, noone is able to tell

3

disembodied_voice t1_janodvx wrote

> One thing that always gets me is carbon emissions in manufacturing. I’m not by any means against electric, but I feel like too many people look at the end product of an electric future but don’t look at the damage that can be done manufacturing it

Even if you look at manufacturing emissions, EVs still have a lower overal carbon footprint than gas cars.

14

DKOS0 t1_jannl4c wrote

One thing that always gets me is carbon emissions in manufacturing. I’m not by any means against electric, but I feel like too many people look at the end product of an electric future but don’t look at the damage that can be done manufacturing it. I’m not against anything, and petrol cars have disadvantages in manufacturing too, but we should be trying to shift more focus on environmental factors and methods of production in literally anything

−5