I just want a bot that folds laundry. Then I am happy.

I dunno, the Roboroc probably cleans better than kids.

I program mine to run while I'm at work. Sometimes I'll come back and it'll be stranded somewhere, but 90% of the time it's back recharging in it's cradle.

Wasn't there a Simpsons episode about this?

I said nothing bad about women, at all. There's nothing in that list demographers trace birthrate declines to that I oppose, other than the coercive measures, like China's one-child policy. Other that that, I celebrate all of those things, even if it leads to exponential population decline.

And it pertains directly to the Fermi Paradox if a declining birthrate can lead to exponential population decline and the collapse of technological civilization. There is no indication that sub-replacement birthrates bounce back automatically, much less to replacement levels. S. Korea, Singapore, Thailand, China, Vietnam, and others are still dropping. They won't drop to zero, but a birthrate of 1 child per woman makes every generation half the size of the one before it. Even the US's 1.6 means that ten women on average will birth eight girls, or 100 women 80. Those 80 women will birth 64, at the same fertility rate. Exponential change is exponential.

There's no way that wouldn't be related to the Fermi paradox. I'm not saying we know for sure this is the answer. There's also the possibility that FTL travel isn't actually possible. Or that technological civilizations are really rare. I'm just saying it's something that no one seems to have seen coming. Of course, before that everyone thought exponential growth would be the great filter, or that Peak Oil or some other Malthusian thing would take us out. But not all exponential change takes the form of growth. But exponential change is still exponential.

Capitalism might be late stage and on its way to the grave, but I think its a mass grave and the floor is made of dead bees and poor people.

Yes. Got fired by talking bullshit and not doing his job in the company and then famous because they fired him. Now he is just double downing.

My take is that any software that is older than a decade or not actively maintained or sold for profit should be required to be open sourced.

The homeless people might disagree concerning work. Statisticly it is more likely you are closer to he guy on the street than the guy in the mansion.

I was hating it first.

But someone told me we're likely a decade away from sex robots capable of self-locomotion and deep learning.

As long as I get to have my AI harem, I'm okay with the other drastic changes to come.

Anprim gang.

The study also showed that a significant proportion of male researchers had lower sperm counts. It concluded there was no correlation and that male researchers are virile actually.

This is hilarious I asked something really similar yesterday, check out my post!

That's great. It does not mean your experience is universal or that people should be shamed for being traumatized and not being able to "overcome" it.

This post refers exclusively to trauma, which cannot always be solved. Try telling your nonsense to PTSD sufferers, that if they just wanted it bad enough, they'd be cured.

[removed]

We are capable of space travel and have not grown past our basic instincts. Again, you are welcome to provide evidence or even a general idea of a process that would lead to a different outcome. Currently, you are just “nut uh”ing me without providing even so much as a pulled out of your ass hypothetical of another way it could happen. Possibility must be demonstrated. If there is another possible path, demonstrate it.

Empathy and collaboration should be at the top of the list with the goal of a circular economy.

Really? Show me the government sponsored social media platform lmao.

I mean, this is definitely kind of the problem of our times. Billionaires and corporations have taken into charging forward into the “technological determinism” paradigm, where technological “progress” takes precedence and society should adapt to it, as opposed to innovating tech and progress BASED on society’s evolving demands, ala a sort of “technological voluntarism”. They’ve pushed this so much over the past few decades that I think most of society just accepts that it’s the status quo. Meanwhile, it’s this rampant, uncontrolled, unmonitored growth that’s leading to the planet’s rampant exploitation/ destruction, and humanity failing to keep up with the rate of technology. It’s not a sustainable model anymore.

This is highly misogynistic garbage and has no connection to the Fermi paradox whatsoever.

It's been known for decades that being active increases sperm count.

I hear rosie palm has a identical twin

You gotta Hand it to these Job experts; they sure know a buildup and a surge after a Load gets relieved.

God creates dinosaurs, God destroys dinosaurs. God creates Man, man destroys God. Man creates dinosaurs.

Dinosaurs eat man. Woman inherits the earth