Recent comments in /f/Futurology
Steamer61 t1_jaajsr0 wrote
They could but they won't. These predictions are always so much more rosy than reality. I'd say that it's going to be more like 25 years at least, more likely 50.
megaed99 t1_jaajmtd wrote
Reply to Does gene editing hold the key to improving mental health? | Research suggests traumatic childhood experiences embed themselves in our brains and put us at risk of mental illness, but epigenetic editing may offer us hope of removing them. by lughnasadh
I sure hope treatment of this sort can become mainstream. I know as well as my doctor that there certain features of myself that are naturally completely irreparable. I am either suicidal depressive or manic. If I am on my medication like I am now, I am a total sociopath who struggles to feel anything other than disinterest, anger or hatred. Unless of course I drink or do drugs.
If something could take all of this away from me, I would be the first to volunteer. It is complete and utter torture that I wouldn't wish on anyone.
commander_wong t1_jaajjqg wrote
Reply to How soon can we grow another set of teeth? by leoyoung1
A lot of regrowing teeth related questions lately, not that I'm not excited for it. Have there been new research or announcement that I'm not aware of?
FalloutNano t1_jaajekc wrote
Reply to comment by StrionicRandom in This “Climate-Friendly” Fuel Comes With an Astronomical Cancer Risk: Almost half of products cleared so far under the new federal biofuels program are not in fact biofuels — and the EPA acknowledges that the plastic-based ones may present an “unreasonable risk” to human health or the environment. by nastratin
Did you not read, or not understand my previous comment? Also, profanity isn’t wanted. Take it elsewhere or don’t reply.
theluckyfrog t1_jaajdab wrote
Reply to This “Climate-Friendly” Fuel Comes With an Astronomical Cancer Risk: Almost half of products cleared so far under the new federal biofuels program are not in fact biofuels — and the EPA acknowledges that the plastic-based ones may present an “unreasonable risk” to human health or the environment. by nastratin
Is there a petition related to this anywhere? I feel like there should be a petition to let the govt know this is not what we mean by "work on the climate issue".
TheInfernalVortex t1_jaaj1st wrote
Reply to comment by Undernown in This “Climate-Friendly” Fuel Comes With an Astronomical Cancer Risk: Almost half of products cleared so far under the new federal biofuels program are not in fact biofuels — and the EPA acknowledges that the plastic-based ones may present an “unreasonable risk” to human health or the environment. by nastratin
And the worst thing is you have to store it under high pressure in big tanks and its extremely flammable. TANSTAAFL.
[deleted] t1_jaaj1p9 wrote
[deleted] t1_jaaivya wrote
[deleted] t1_jaaiv4n wrote
Reply to This “Climate-Friendly” Fuel Comes With an Astronomical Cancer Risk: Almost half of products cleared so far under the new federal biofuels program are not in fact biofuels — and the EPA acknowledges that the plastic-based ones may present an “unreasonable risk” to human health or the environment. by nastratin
[removed]
[deleted] t1_jaaipcf wrote
EvilBit3514 t1_jaaidb3 wrote
Reply to comment by sigmatrophic in This “Climate-Friendly” Fuel Comes With an Astronomical Cancer Risk: Almost half of products cleared so far under the new federal biofuels program are not in fact biofuels — and the EPA acknowledges that the plastic-based ones may present an “unreasonable risk” to human health or the environment. by nastratin
When Marx and Engels wrote "What the Bourgeoisie therefore produces, above all, are its own grave diggers", this is what they meant. Capital twists the fabric of society, governance, justice, and people, wringing out profits into fewer and fewer hands. Eventually it all has to snap.
The rise of climate change, ecological disaster, and nuclear brinkmanship changes the game, though. Class struggle is becoming a matter of not just how we order society, but humanity existing at all.
fugupinkeye t1_jaaicv8 wrote
Reply to The world should be governed by people with intellectual thought and people should listen by New-Shop-7539
Or you could try to structure ways to reach those ideals and goals that include safeguards against the things that happen in the real world.
Rakshear t1_jaai02f wrote
Reply to The world should be governed by people with intellectual thought and people should listen by New-Shop-7539
The problem being many People only seem intelligent and compassionate while they share your views and you share theirs, take Reddit as an example. Sure many mods on many threads help keep it all civil and peaceful, but how many subreddits are not just censored but controlled by mods who have nearly unchecked power in their sub? What happens when you say something they disagree with even though it doesn’t break the rules? Banned, silenced, and removed. That doesn’t happen often granted, at least in the subs I frequent and I haven’t been banned from any, but it does happen every now and then to some. Again this being Reddit, and subreddits being limited to certain topics most people who get banned did something as there is a suspension period before permanently banning, but still, some mods do power trip, and they go basically unchecked.
strvgglecity t1_jaahwwv wrote
Did the industrial revolution make work "easier" or just more efficient/productive?
grumblecakes1 t1_jaahpfz wrote
Reply to comment by Amazing-Ad-669 in Magnetic pole reversal by Gopokes91
It has irregular intervals too. without looking it up i believe there is a few times where it flipped several times in just a few thousand years.
lacker101 t1_jaahh08 wrote
Reply to comment by Houston_Here in Sunlight reflection (solar geoengineering) must be studied: scientists by BernieEcclestoned
Oh that movie? I remember the other one. You know where Elon Musk makes a fusion powered world train, has bloodsports, and forces people to eat bugs.
Perhaps instead we could have some of those nuclear powered plants to help supplement where solar ain't so great.
New-Shop-7539 OP t1_jaagpp2 wrote
Reply to comment by drzdeano in The world should be governed by people with intellectual thought and people should listen by New-Shop-7539
You just brought tears to my eyes.You also hit a good few nails on the head.
Thanks for this comment and you are right
NVincarnate t1_jaagolm wrote
Reply to Universal ethics/basic law for all people & global moral education: A new way to sustainability and peace? by fortin1984
Universally mandating peace sounds like a recipe for failure.
The core problem with world peace is that every culture is different and disagrees on what is ethically correct. The drinking age is different everywhere.
Trying to generalize universal rules over everyone everywhere seems like a waste of time.
Use technology to improve quality of living and access to basic rights (food, clothing, shelter, medical care, etc.) and see how quickly crime rates drop. Employing a universal law to control everyone in a certain direction while still allowing people to be homeless will never work or change anything.
diamond t1_jaagk9d wrote
Reply to comment by Courtside237 in Magnetic pole reversal by Gopokes91
Will my underwear spontaneously turn inside out? That would be really embarrassing, and I would like to be prepared.
StarChild413 t1_jaagjrs wrote
Reply to comment by XueShiLong in The world should be governed by people with intellectual thought and people should listen by New-Shop-7539
And without an infinite regress of people forced into service to others how do you check the corruption of the people in power-behind-the-throne holding the ability to force others into power
WetnessPensive t1_jaagiqj wrote
Reply to comment by colintbowers in The world should be governed by people with intellectual thought and people should listen by New-Shop-7539
We have studies that show that what passes for "democracies" are in fact highly anti democratic (in the sense that the laws they pass overwhelmingly favor a oligarchic minority, and uphold an exclusionary regime of property rights). So that's not really a good example.
The OP's post made me think of some kind of Star Trek future. Or maybe you could have an education system in which a computer selects the smartest people in various fields, and then randomly selects a group of them to lead for a set time, upon which they're replaced by another random selection.
You can even combine this with things like citizen's assemblies, or forms of participatory democracy. ie, the Big Brain Geniuses meet with randomly-chosen citizens to work on legislation, and if convinced by the Big Brain Geniuses, the citizens rubber stamp the legislation and push it up the chain to be enacted as law. This creates a kind of check on authoritarianism or on the Big Brain Geniuses steamrolling the populace.
And actually, some of this stuff has been tried in various countries to good effect (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Charrette). What typically stands in the way of these methods being implemented is the usual thing: moneyed interests.
LoWkEyPyRaT t1_jaagel2 wrote
Reply to comment by New-Shop-7539 in The world should be governed by people with intellectual thought and people should listen by New-Shop-7539
And they will...nothing will change that, not you or these hopes you have.
Artanthos t1_jaagb6d wrote
Reply to comment by PumpkinImportant3282 in Should Microsoft open source older versions of Windows!?!? by odilasa
The business world obviously disagrees.
LoWkEyPyRaT t1_jaajxya wrote
Reply to comment by WetnessPensive in The world should be governed by people with intellectual thought and people should listen by New-Shop-7539
That intern creates a caste system...always funny seeing those intellectuals think people always follows rules and laws according to others...it won't ever work. Keep trying tho. Humans are not robots.