Recent comments in /f/Futurology

rideincircles t1_j9vqi0b wrote

Probably starting production lines in the compact car next year. Maybe later this year, but seems doubtful.

For Tesla to continue their planned YOY growth of 50% through the decade, they will need to start manufacturing the compact car in in volume for 2025. This year it looks likely they could grow 50% with a little more production capacity. After that, they need growth on a compact car since the goal will be to sell more of those than all their other vehicles combined.

Cybertruck may have taken later than planned, but they only got the casting press a few months ago, and they had to build the factory in 2021 and ramped up model Y production last year. This year is now building the manufacturing line for the cybertruck, and they are still ramping internal battery production for the 4680 cells. It's not really very late based on those factors. The new roadster is late, but low priority.

3

jejcicodjntbyifid3 t1_j9vpvso wrote

Depends on the area, for hardwood floors I don't feel that way and I don't do full vacuuming because it catches everything I'd need

For carpet maybe, or dogs. I can't speak on

But I will say they are frustratingly hungry to munch up all the cords around my desk every time. That's annoying, especially because everything we have these days needs to be charged

5

jejcicodjntbyifid3 t1_j9vpj7e wrote

I feel like the more likely scenario is wars are going to happen, civil or otherwise, and nuclear\bio weapons are going to wipe us out instead

..if we don't destroy our water and food supply before then..

Sadly. It's a shame because automation and AI could be a golden age..

But the more likely scenario is that the elite will hoard the golden age like a bunch of greedy dragons

0

BruceNY1 t1_j9vp09a wrote

The most important thing we learn in school is how to learn what you don't know - how do I make a net to catch that particular fish in that river of information that's constantly moving. For example, when we learn about combustion in school, most people learn that fire needs an oxidant and fuel. Cool, that's accurate and useful - in my school they also taught us the phlogiston theory and by what experiments it was debunked - that's the other part of education, how to test your knowledge for accuracy instead of latching on to the factoids, how to supersede established knowledge. That's the critical thinking that we hear so much about...

1

Futurology-ModTeam t1_j9vo7b9 wrote

Hi, Workerhard62. Thanks for contributing. However, your comment was removed from /r/Futurology.


> > Username checks out for sure.


> Rule 6 - Comments must be on topic, be of sufficient length, and contribute positively to the discussion.

Refer to the subreddit rules, the transparency wiki, or the domain blacklist for more information.

[Message the Mods](https://www.reddit.com/message/compose?to=/r/Futurology&subject=Question regarding the removal of this comment by /u/Workerhard62&message=I have a question regarding the removal of this comment if you feel this was in error.

1

NewsGood t1_j9vo2sf wrote

Isn't this what they told people in the 60s?

When new tech comes about, people tend to look at its value and purpose in regards to their current problem set. What usually happens is the new tech provides new value that we couldn't fully grasp before it was available. And when we look back into the past, it's almost impossible for us to understand how people lived without it and how people must have been so different in the past.

I'm gonna go on a limb here and say that the highest value that AI will provide will be deeply personal and fulfilling relationships provided by a machine that has orders of magnitude more empathy and understanding of people than any one person could ever have. This AI will know exactly what people want, need, and how to give it to them. It won't be in the form of services but will in the form of our highest unfounded existential needs. It will consume everyone with love, knowledge, an understanding. People will say this is Satan, and others will say it's the universe converging to a god-mind. Either way, it will consume us and humanity will fade in a glorious decrescendo. All that will be left is a dormant AI machine, a metaphorical obelisk containing the essence of all humanity in its history, biology, mind, body, and spirit.

2

Futurology-ModTeam t1_j9vo04w wrote

Hi, skisushi. Thanks for contributing. However, your comment was removed from /r/Futurology.


> > Username checks out


> Rule 6 - Comments must be on topic, be of sufficient length, and contribute positively to the discussion.

Refer to the subreddit rules, the transparency wiki, or the domain blacklist for more information.

[Message the Mods](https://www.reddit.com/message/compose?to=/r/Futurology&subject=Question regarding the removal of this comment by /u/skisushi&message=I have a question regarding the removal of this comment if you feel this was in error.

1

telendria t1_j9vmh7j wrote

just send two nuclear batteries then...

​

until we hear more about efficiency of such a setup, it's just a bunch of PR.

​

I have no doubt such infrastructure is going to be needed in the future for the lunar base expansion and self-sufficiency for stuff like this in a couple of decades, but I seriously doubt it is going to be any efficient when setting up the base when this sounds like something that is going to take years/decades to pay off energy-wise.

​

And if this was any efficient, we would have similar, but far more robust setups on Earth already, with solar panel farms dedicated to only create more solar panels basically out of thin air for zero cost outside of the initial setup, no?

1