Recent comments in /f/Futurology
strvgglecity t1_j9tjxmu wrote
Right now in Colorado a 25k auto loan with a $3k down payment and 60-month term at 7% would be $479/month, nearly double your "best guess".
Northcliff t1_j9tjtk5 wrote
Reply to comment by maskedpaki in The future holds a 25000$ compact EV leasing at 250$ pr month by RolfEjerskov
That is such a horrible deal
Lord0fHats t1_j9tjsse wrote
Reply to comment by prion in The future holds a 25000$ compact EV leasing at 250$ pr month by RolfEjerskov
You'll own nothing and you'll worship the ground your very stable entrepreneurial genius' overlords walk on, and you'll like it!
[deleted] OP t1_j9tjqw6 wrote
Reply to comment by DoctorYoy in Return to Office - My experience & rationalization. by [deleted]
[deleted]
Workerhard62 OP t1_j9tj3wm wrote
Reply to comment by ShowNudesForLove in What happens to the education system when AI answers our thoughts on demand? by Workerhard62
Very well said. Meta-cognition seems to be a popular term lately.
[deleted] t1_j9tj3bd wrote
Workerhard62 OP t1_j9tiwdw wrote
Reply to comment by 7grims in What happens to the education system when AI answers our thoughts on demand? by Workerhard62
Very well said. I also think the implications are huge.
Hot-Category2986 t1_j9tiuc3 wrote
Since I've been working from home I've saved easily $75-$100 per week in fuel and food. (Michigan) That's money that the government needs circulating. So I can see why they want us going to the office again. The goof is that with inflation, I have still been spending that money elsewhere. Groceries this two week were $660 for my small family. That same order was $400 a year ago, and $300 before Covid. So I don't get it. What makes them think the money is just pooling up somewhere?
daveescaped t1_j9tislk wrote
Reply to comment by d5vour5r in Return to Office - My experience & rationalization. by [deleted]
I’m naive? You have a vested interest in the topic.
Workerhard62 OP t1_j9tisgk wrote
Reply to comment by spudmix in After GPT, what's the next great thing for AI? by Workerhard62
Haha yea, haven't even thought of this. Self-improving AI.
[deleted] t1_j9tiqlc wrote
maskedpaki t1_j9tig7i wrote
25K at 250 a month ? lol
​
try 25k at 500 a month with a 5k deposit over 4 years and even that would be a good car deal in todays climate.
​
what planet do you live on that allows you to lease 25k cars at 3k a year ?
[deleted] t1_j9thu33 wrote
Reply to comment by [deleted] in Almost 40% of domestic tasks could be done by robots ‘within decade’ | Artificial intelligence (AI) by Gari_305
[removed]
[deleted] t1_j9thjl2 wrote
landlord2213 OP t1_j9thhb7 wrote
Here’s one more reason to love a good mushroom: one day, you might be able to make headphones, memory foam for shoes, or even aircraft exoskeletons with it. Researchers just assessed the engineering possibilities with one particularly impressive mushroom and found that it might be able to replace plastic in a whole bunch of different use cases.
Using mushrooms instead of plastic could cut down on the mountains of waste humans create. Plastics made out of fossil fuels are actually really difficult to recycle and usually wind up cluttering landfills, landscapes, and waterways. Materials made with mushrooms, on the other hand, would be biodegradable and could be reused at the end of a product’s life to make more of the same stuff.
d5vour5r t1_j9thc4b wrote
Reply to comment by daveescaped in Return to Office - My experience & rationalization. by [deleted]
Naive, while employer's may find someone from another part of the country to work cheaper (WFH) based on the cost of living; offshore resources rarely have the same output/competency as local resources.
I WFH 95% (rare customer site visit) and work a 4 day week (condensed hours). Several months ago I interviewed with a competitor (they sort me out) for a very senior role and after the first interview, I told them no thanks. 3 months later they called back wanting to tell me why I wasn't successful and see if I had given second thoughts to WFH! i told them I cancelled the application and their mandate of 5 days a week and 3 days min in the office was unacceptable.
WFH is here to stay for many and 4 day weeks will be the norm in 5 years. My current employer has mentioned my output and general happiness has increased since WFH and further increased with the move to 4 days.
johnp299 t1_j9th5q9 wrote
Reply to comment by bablebooee in Will we be able to modify our brains in the future? by bablebooee
When a person is overwhelmed with emotions, fear, anger, their own safety and the safety of others can be at risk. I'm not saying get rid of emotions entirely. But the human brain can be so dominated by emotions at times that it screws everything else up. 100,000 years ago, it wasn't so terrible if someone flipped out. But now, with everything from guns to nukes at our disposal, it's a different story. The structure of the brain is an impediment to progress.
[deleted] OP t1_j9th52x wrote
[removed]
DunkingDognuts t1_j9th49o wrote
Reply to Almost 40% of domestic tasks could be done by robots ‘within decade’ | Artificial intelligence (AI) by Gari_305
So more jobs lost. More people on welfare or unemployed while the ultra rich buy another private island to fly to in their fleet of private jets.
I don’t hate technology, but I’ll be goddamned if we should be rushing headlong into “OMG, AI is a miracle that will release us from all of our obligation to work” without contemplating the reality of tens of millions of people not having any employment or means to support themselves.
And to all of those who say “ B, but… Universal, basic income!“ I ask you where are the money for that is going to come from? Taxes? From the unemployed? The corporations that are getting rid of employees so they can use AI to take the cost of salaries out of their balance sheet? You really think those corporations are going to not fight tooth and nail not have to pay a cent to support universal basic income programs? They own the politicians.
It’s amazing how eagerly we are rushing into literally a “hunger games” dystopia.
Nobody thinks they are going to be the person living under a bridge because they don’t have a job as a programmer anymore.
Think it through people, don’t be blinded by the new shiny thing.
[deleted] OP t1_j9th1x2 wrote
Reply to comment by Deftek178 in Return to Office - My experience & rationalization. by [deleted]
[deleted]
[deleted] t1_j9tgvz1 wrote
Reply to comment by Erophysia in After GPT, what's the next great thing for AI? by Workerhard62
[removed]
Workerhard62 OP t1_j9tgs9m wrote
Reply to comment by amitym in What happens to the education system when AI answers our thoughts on demand? by Workerhard62
Good point.
Workerhard62 OP t1_j9tgqa2 wrote
Reply to comment by Skylarkess in After GPT, what's the next great thing for AI? by Workerhard62
Now we're talking...
ScaleLongjumping3606 t1_j9tgk2t wrote
Reply to What happens to the education system when AI answers our thoughts on demand? by Workerhard62
It doesn’t really matter if AI can answer any question if you don’t know what to ask.
MisterNobody777 t1_j9tk3vu wrote
Reply to comment by just-a-dreamer- in Return to Office - My experience & rationalization. by [deleted]
Improving an employees life is exactly how capitalist systems work. It’s a competitive market. An employer can attract top talent with low attrition by keeping employees happy. This is very beneficial to a business.
Unhappy employee = low output and/or attrition = bad profit
Since it’s such a capitalist market this “unhappy employee” can search for an employer that would make them more “happy”. Employers will then improve happiness of employees to attract this “unhappy employee” so he’ll leave his current company.