Can you take a moment, read what you wrote, and actually fucking think about it for a second?

We're in this situation because the "incentives to innovate and compete" directly lead to YouTube recommending Isis training videos to people susceptible to wanting to join Isis because THAT MADE YOUTUBE THE MOST MONEY.

Yeah my main account was created in 2007 or 08. Sadly I deleted it when I was going through a life transition. Really wish I still had that account would love to look back at some of the things I posted

Cooool. And what land do you do that on, again? Who pays the taxes on the land? Who has access to seeds, fertilizer, building materials, power, water, etc?

Bro I wish I could shovel what you're digging, but that shit is fucking crack in a baggy bro. You're literally in orbit on this train. Your Shit ain't real bro.

So, then they only offer youtube by subscription and verified sign up, and you have to agree that if you see videos that offend you thats your tought titties. Problem solved.

Shrodingers Internet

I feel like there's one key difference. When I buy a book, take it home, and read it, another one doesn't magically appear in my hands open to the first page and with my eyes already reading it faster than I can slam it shut. With a video online? That's typically how it goes. You've got about 8 seconds to click whatever button stops it from dumping you onto the next "suggested" video.

To be honest, it's these results which makes me uninspired. In going from 17 physical qubits to 49, they were able to reduce the error rate from... 3.0 to 2.9 percent. Even though this is a big milestone for the field, in absolute terms it's abysmal.

This is also only with a tiny number of logical qubits. Scaling these systems to usable sizes will take decades.

Sorry, had to bail on the page because of all the ads.

Usually nationalising something like that wouldn't work because incentives aren't there to innovate and compete for the gov.

Yes, but in general all umbrella of different values. Since it is also practicality and productivity. Search and auto recommenders and other types of AI systems.

I'm not so sure; this could change that. As I understand it, error correction is the most major hurdle to scaling quantum stuff.

I mean the whole point of "Moore's law is dead" was that... Moore's law, is in fact dead. It wasn't the end of scaling, but the end of the self fulfilling prophecy which they targeted as the rate of scaling for decades has run its course.

It's not the end of transistor scaling, but instead the end of Moore's law, the golden age has come to a close and odds are the respective companies have already been working years at what they consider to be the solution going forwards.

AMD is looking to stack compute with memory. Nvidia looking into AI based image scaling.

That is incredibly fucking ignorant of you but I don't have the time or energy to explain how some people work two or three jobs but still don't have enough money to pay for health insurance, and even if they did, how little coverage cheap plans actually offer.

The USA is the only country in the world where "medical bankruptcy" is a thing and thats a fucking crime.

Shroedinger's kitten mittens

But will I still be able to download stl models for printing or get... Pirated ebooks for my college classes? 🤔

I mean nothing is more critical and endangering of life than healthcare yet the entire US political system is strictly against enacting nationalized healthcare.

Literally a matter of life and death and the whole nation turns a blind eye.

just learned what shors algorithm is (kind of). super neat

Reddit really is an echo chamber damn

There’s more nuance. My understanding is this case revolves around the promotion of ISIS videos.

[removed]

Gotcha, so then if you keep going back to the same book store and asking about books that are all in aisle 3 row 7. Not always shelf 2, or what ever just sticking with the analog. Is it not okay if the cashier sees you come in and mentions that they just got a new book in that section?

Clearly they are promoting it if this is your first time, probably promoting it if it is your second time, but eventually it becomes just good service. They got a book in that section, they know you keep asking for stuff that is in that area. They want to sell books, is it not okay for them to let you know about the new item?

I am not trying to slippery slope as I agree, the line between a publisher and distributor is very fuzzy with stuff like search engines,YouTube, Tik Tok, etc. I am just curious where you think the line is as I agree there probably should be one, but don’t know where.

Hahaha they wish. All this memory and compute power is proving you can do now what those quantum machines will be doing in ten years.

As someone who primary source of entertainment is YouTube, and has been on YouTube along time. I can say their video filter is not perfect in any sense. I have seen videos that should have been pulled down do to it violating their terms and conditions that stayed for along time. I have also seen "perfectly good" (lack of better word) video get pulled down or straight up demonetize for variety of reasons that made zero sense but was marked by their AI. Improper marking causing content creators to lose money which in turns hurts YouTube and their creators.

I have been on YouTube long time, and everything that was ever recommended to me has been closely related to what I have or am actively watching. I would say their algorithm for recommending video for person who actual has an account with them is pretty spot on. The only time I seen off the wall stuff is when I watch YouTube from a device that I'm not login into or incognito mode, and the same thing for advertisements. My question is what are people looking up that causing YouTube to recommend this kind of stuff cause I never seen it on YouTube or google advertise. Usually I find on reddit.

With every one of these announcements, I'm more and more convinced we are really far away from a practical quantum computer. It feels like fusion in the 1970's.

If you're not convinced, all you have to do is ask what's the largest number that's been factored using Shor's algorithm. The answer is the same as it was in 2012: 21. Not quite the exponential progress we saw with transistors.

I am not sure I understand your point. You are saying that the lawmakers should consider entertainment value when writing the laws?