I'm not disputing this?

I'm literally just taking the stance of "if you're taking bets on the current Justice cohort"

Except when we go reinterpreting the constitution to be what is constitution despite very clear caselaw that says the constitutional is clear on what is allowed like what happened with the First Amendment and prayer in school.

​

We can go all day about this man... the constitution is clearly being reinterpreted by "originalists" who are anything but. Its a tale as old as time and something that even in the early 19 century was rejected as "originalism" goes against the clear intent of the constitution.

Luddites making decisions about technology, what could possibly go wrong?

Its not like a book store at all. First, Google/YouTube aren't being sued because of the content of the videos (which is protected under 230), they're being sued because they are promoting radicalism (in this case from ISIS) to susceptible users in order to sell advertising. They know that they are susceptible because of their search history and other discrete data that they have. Instead of the bookstore analogy, its more like a bar that keeps serving the drunk at the counter more and more alcohol, even without being asked, and handing the drunk his car keys to drive home.

The purpose of 230 is to allow ISPs to remove harmful/inappropriate content without facing liability, and allow them to make good faith mistakes in not removing harmful/inappropriate content and not face liability. What the Content Providers are saying is that they can show anything without facing liability, and that it is appropriate for them to push harmful/inappropriate content to people who they know are susceptible to increase user engagement to increase advertising revenue.

The Google/YouTube algorithm actively pushes content to the user that it thinks the user should see to keep the user engaged in order to sell advertising. Here, the Google/YouTube algorithm kept pushing more and more ISIS videos to the guy who committed the terrorism.

What the Google/YouTube algorithm should be doing is saying "videos in categories X, Y and Z will not be promoted." Not remove them. Not censor them. Just not promote them via the algorithm.

They could function more like a publisher, with editorial review of the content that is shared on a feed. Or they could revert to something like MySpace, where everything is published and it’s on the user to find accounts they like and visit them.

I had to look it up — 2006 founded by Aaron Schwarz, who they killed for his contributions…

He would shit if he knew what corporate tool its become.

I got on in 2008 when the internet was still wild and free and beautiful…

In 2011 you could find out everything you needed to know to buy <almost> anything you wanted on the darknet via Reddit.

Vendors used to run specials- you could interact w them. Hell, you could still chat w Dread for a few years after come to think of it.

The Establishment just had NO idea

Man, when all that collapsed — when those FBI banners sprang up all over the deepweb, it was like you just knew it was the beginning of the end.

Reddit cracked down shortly after … as usual, they cracked down on stuff that shoulda been locked down long before (underage/sketchy nudes), and used that as an excuse to just shatter all the libertarian communities (small ‘l’, not like Ron Paul).

Ha ha— that little date look up sent me down a memory hole, lol!

Usually as the result of "congress needs to create new legislation for this to be constitutional"

Anyone who's super into quantum computing and think it's the future please watch sabine hossenfelders videos on qc. It's insightful.

Only thing you learn then is how to let your sack sag in public locker rooms and develop an immunity to shame. Just like real old folks.

Now that I think about it more, reddit has been around quite a while. I'm sure a lot of the user base aged with it. I think it's been around for 20 years right?

I don't have the video editing skills to do that very well. I could probably throw some Liam Neeson fight scene jump cuts your way.

Are there stats?

I have to imagine Reddit has aged — I know I have, lol.

But, also, the how-to content is huge now. It was a lot more niche when it was first rolling.

Yeah ik, there's just some others in the comments joking that this would get you beat up, which I think is unrealistic.

How much of it have you seen?

That's what I'm saying if you don't have my comedic tone and Appalachian accent, you might try not calling the whole gym pussies. But there's generally someone in a gym that's cool as hell and knows a disturbing amount about anatomy. They will pump you up.

This article in particular was about rejuvenation. But even if it wasn't, how about living long enough for a cure of whatever's failing you to be found?

[deleted]

This would give them more incentive to control what's being said online, though. Because they'd have to or get sued

Honestly, true gym bros are usually really helpful and appreciate it when others show an interest in their hobby.

There would probably be at least one guy willing to help show you around the gym and start training.

It's entirely comparable and it's literally what's happening under the hood of the algorithms. There are correlations built between what you engage with and what others who engaged with that also engaged with so it would be exactly the same as asking for gang related materials and the librarian said "oh you might also want to check out books on trafficking, people who look up stuff on gangs look at that too". Are they speaking on behalf of the entire library because you engaged with them and they answered your question? It really sounds to me like you don't understand how software, servers, algorithms, etc. work.

AI + quantum computing will change the world so fast that something will break.

The following submission statement was provided by /u/Ezekiel_W:

>Quantum computer systems have been hailed as the future of computing, able to make calculations that could be very difficult or impossible on the “classical” computers that we use today.
>
>But they are also prone to errors, that represent one of the major issues in the practical application of the technology.
>
>Now Google researchers say they have found a way of building the technology so that it corrects those errors. The company says it is a breakthrough on a par with its announcement three years ago that it had reached “quantum supremacy”, and represents a milestone on the way to the functional use of quantum computers.
>
>Researchers at Google Quantum AI said they have found a way to lower error rates as the size of the system increases, which they describe as being at a “break-even point”.
>
>Dr Hartmut Neven, engineering director at Google Quantum AI, said while there are still challenges that lie ahead, he thinks that at this stage “we can confidently promise a commercial value” for quantum computers.

Please reply to OP's comment here: https://old.reddit.com/r/Futurology/comments/11951y6/google_announces_major_breakthrough_that/j9kf95m/

We’ve tried going through legislation but they refuse to do anything remotely constructive… Something needs to be done

Lol username checks out.

[removed]