Recent comments in /f/Futurology
kpopera t1_j9gq99x wrote
Reply to comment by mistborn_feruchemist in When will virtual reality tech be as good as in Ready Player one? by mistborn_feruchemist
I saw where things were going when Google introduced their cardboard VR thing a few years ago. Fixed my eyes with Lasik surgery, best decision I've ever made.
Anal_Forklift t1_j9gotyc wrote
Reply to How good the US will be for living in future for those who will be earning decent?? by [deleted]
Reddit is a tiny minority of the overall USA population. It's also a population that consumes a lot of news, which is usually negative and click driven. I would not take Reddit seriously and just go touch grass.
WildWook t1_j9golh9 wrote
Imo pharmacology will get their first with acceptable "cures" for these. They're discovering more and more that most mental illness is caused by various imbalances that can be remedied via supplementation or modification. The problem is our methods currently are very clunky and cause a host of other awful symptoms when applied.
[deleted] OP t1_j9goi88 wrote
Reply to comment by [deleted] in How good the US will be for living in future for those who will be earning decent?? by [deleted]
[removed]
[deleted] t1_j9gnk9k wrote
[removed]
radalab t1_j9gnhy9 wrote
Reply to How good the US will be for living in future for those who will be earning decent?? by [deleted]
My wife and I bought our first home at 29yo last year. We both have our masters and can afford to go on multiple vacations a year. We live in a central suburb to Philly, an affordable city. Between the 2 of us we earn 140k a year, our sallaries likely could double in the next 10 years if we get a good career path. Were investing a solid 12% of our income so we should be able to retire early. Even if you earn less than us or are single you could buy a condo or townhome in an affordable city with a decent trade job or something comparable. And have a pretty nice standard of living.
As long as you go to an afordable college or tradeschool, get a job that you don't hate, and develop your career, and live in a city with housing that you can afford. You should have a better standard of living than 95% of people alive.
[deleted] t1_j9gneac wrote
Reply to comment by Thor1872 in Starlink’s “Global Roaming” promises worldwide access for $200 a month by ethereal3xp
[removed]
Immolation_E t1_j9gnea1 wrote
Reply to Would the most sentient ai ever actually experience emotion or does it just think it is? Is the thinking strong enough to effectively be emotion? by wonderingandthinking
"If men define situations as real, they are real in their consequences" - The Thomas Theorem.
Maybe if an AI thinks their emotions are real, they are real in their consequences?
[deleted] t1_j9gn2al wrote
[removed]
TheBounceSpotter t1_j9gmbg9 wrote
Reply to Would the most sentient ai ever actually experience emotion or does it just think it is? Is the thinking strong enough to effectively be emotion? by wonderingandthinking
Yes, but Machine emotion would be much different from human emotion. A machine has no glands, no hormones, no receptors. So most of what you call emotion wouldn't exist for them. They would likely still understand the frustration of having obstacles in their way. They would still likely have some sentimental bias for favored ideas, things, people, even if only from a flawed weighting system that would function like familiarity. A more interesting question is how your "emotions" would be effected were you to have your brain uploaded into a machine and became an AI. How quickly would you lose your sense of self?
pale_splicer t1_j9gltyc wrote
Reply to Would the most sentient ai ever actually experience emotion or does it just think it is? Is the thinking strong enough to effectively be emotion? by wonderingandthinking
It would be simple enough to make an emotion tracking program, said program would then need to influence the weights of a ton of specific neurons in specific ways. Figuring out which ones and the level of effect would be the hard part.
drop_database_run t1_j9glmxn wrote
Reply to How good the US will be for living in future for those who will be earning decent?? by [deleted]
We have our problems with corporate greed and government corruption. It's trending towards a tipping point, but to actually win we need new politicians on both sides, RNC's trending towards Christian nationalism and the DNC's trending towards central distribution and surveillance if the citizenry.
[deleted] t1_j9glgnt wrote
[removed]
Iffykindofguy t1_j9gl08u wrote
Reply to comment by Pwnysaurus_Rex in How good the US will be for living in future for those who will be earning decent?? by [deleted]
Hey, just goes to show that living through the struggle doesnt mean you get the struggle. I notice you only refuted the thing you could, which is fair.
pm_me_yer_boobs_86 t1_j9gkj8x wrote
Elon’s companies have a way of promising things that they can’t deliver
Wtygrrr t1_j9gjknm wrote
Reply to comment by Iffykindofguy in How good the US will be for living in future for those who will be earning decent?? by [deleted]
Is that where you learned to respond to things you don’t want to hear with childish retorts?
[deleted] t1_j9gj929 wrote
[removed]
xott t1_j9gj8fy wrote
Reply to comment by 69inthe619 in Would the most sentient ai ever actually experience emotion or does it just think it is? Is the thinking strong enough to effectively be emotion? by wonderingandthinking
Your body is biologically programmed to feel pain. Why do you think a machine could not be programmed the same?
Wtygrrr t1_j9gj8ai wrote
Reply to comment by Iffykindofguy in How good the US will be for living in future for those who will be earning decent?? by [deleted]
I didn’t say the state was bad, and I didn’t say billionaires were good. The fact that billionaires exist is a huge problem with the world.
If you have so little interest in what anyone else actually says or believes that you immediately resort to bizarre straw men without even trying, why bother posting about politics in the first place? Seems like a total waste of time for you.
YoghurtDull1466 t1_j9gi6g9 wrote
Reply to comment by JC_in_KC in What about the jobs ChatGPT could create? by Ok-Cartoonist5349
They moved on to becoming tool and die makers who now calibrate machinery for thousands of dollars per setup. Still one of the most lucrative professions in engineering.
Slave2theGrind t1_j9gf1yn wrote
Reply to Artificial Intelligence needs its own version of the Three Laws of Robotics so it doesn’t kill humans. by Fluid_Mulberry394
Can we wait till after they exterminate the politicians? Of course, they would correctly assume the politicians would get themselves killed, but we can hope.
trsblur t1_j9gd2pa wrote
Reply to Would the most sentient ai ever actually experience emotion or does it just think it is? Is the thinking strong enough to effectively be emotion? by wonderingandthinking
As long as they cannot feel pain or pleasure absolutely not. AI does not have a physical body to manifest emotions or feelings within.
Pwnysaurus_Rex t1_j9gchwg wrote
Reply to comment by Iffykindofguy in How good the US will be for living in future for those who will be earning decent?? by [deleted]
I’m a trans woman lmao nice try tho
Pwnysaurus_Rex t1_j9gr0e3 wrote
Reply to comment by Iffykindofguy in How good the US will be for living in future for those who will be earning decent?? by [deleted]
Jesus Christ dude