Recent comments in /f/Futurology
Reffska t1_j9g2bi7 wrote
Reply to comment by mistborn_feruchemist in When will virtual reality tech be as good as in Ready Player one? by mistborn_feruchemist
I just wear them underneath or use contact lenses for "longer" sessions, I have very sensitive eyes, so I had to test through many brand (for free in the glasses-store) and use some drops now and then (evey time I take the headset of for a short break)
smellsmira t1_j9g2954 wrote
Reply to comment by nolitos in Would the most sentient ai ever actually experience emotion or does it just think it is? Is the thinking strong enough to effectively be emotion? by wonderingandthinking
What you’re proposing is relatively new exploration and not accepted by main stream psychology. Emotions as we understand them now absolutely do affect our decision making. It is interesting though and perhaps the consensus will change.
nolitos t1_j9g06j3 wrote
Reply to comment by smellsmira in Would the most sentient ai ever actually experience emotion or does it just think it is? Is the thinking strong enough to effectively be emotion? by wonderingandthinking
>Well emotions is both very valuable and detrimental to human decision making.
Except that they aren't. Your eyes "see" a lion, send signals to your brain. It sends signals to your adrenal glands, they produce adrenaline - you run. Emotions and even your conscious don't participate in the process. AFAIK, there's no scientific proof that we need emotions to function.
One curious experiment on the decision making: https://www.nature.com/articles/news.2008.751
For all we know, our conscious is simply making up good stories for us: https://www.nature.com/articles/483260a
dragonblade_94 t1_j9g02dl wrote
Reply to comment by 69inthe619 in Would the most sentient ai ever actually experience emotion or does it just think it is? Is the thinking strong enough to effectively be emotion? by wonderingandthinking
I think you need to clarify exactly how you describe feeling, as it seems like you keep swapping between physical pain and emotion, or at least treat one as if it requires the presence of the other.
I would also like to ask how exactly you would define a 'machine.' If we could recreate a human cell-by-cell, including full creative liberty on how the brain is built and functioned, would it be a machine? Would this humunculous have 'feeling', despite being functionally programmed by it's creators? Is the qualification of a machine that it must be built with inorganic materials?
skymoods t1_j9fzyjs wrote
Reply to Would the most sentient ai ever actually experience emotion or does it just think it is? Is the thinking strong enough to effectively be emotion? by wonderingandthinking
no because emotions are formed from neurotransmitters, not thoughts. even some people don't experience emotions due to neurotransmitter dysfunction. like people suffering from severe depression or psychosis- they can think their way through emotions and experiences but not actually feel them.
DeltaV-Mzero t1_j9fzf3x wrote
Reply to comment by rogert2 in Third person cured of HIV after stem cell transplant, researchers say by esprit-de-lescalier
New Henrietta Lax situation?
Mercurionio t1_j9fz3ca wrote
Reply to Would the most sentient ai ever actually experience emotion or does it just think it is? Is the thinking strong enough to effectively be emotion? by wonderingandthinking
No, it won't.
Emotions are:
-
chemical reactions. AI does not need them, only electricity.
-
irrational. AI won't do mistakes because it doesn't need mistakes.
mistborn_feruchemist OP t1_j9fz26s wrote
Reply to comment by Darlos9D in When will virtual reality tech be as good as in Ready Player one? by mistborn_feruchemist
I'm gonna take an anime girl avatar myself
Darlos9D t1_j9fyw74 wrote
Depends on what you mean by "good." If you mean that level of consistent model fidelity and aesthetics, then the answer is "never" and it only takes one look at VR chat to know why. That's the real metaverse, not whatever Facebook is peddling. Given free reign, people will drown you in fursonas and anime girls that never belonged in the same room together. And that's a good thing, it shouldn't be some sterile environment where people are forced to be part of some specific aesthetic.
If by good you mean widely adopted, I think other responses have addressed that.
midnitelux t1_j9fygv5 wrote
Reply to comment by theironlion245 in Would the most sentient ai ever actually experience emotion or does it just think it is? Is the thinking strong enough to effectively be emotion? by wonderingandthinking
First of all, I never once mentioned ChatGPT in my original message. And nor did the OP, so don’t bring it into the conversation without properly addressing it. Second, your sarcasm isn’t even that good.
[deleted] OP t1_j9fx09h wrote
Reply to comment by fthepats in How good the US will be for living in future for those who will be earning decent?? by [deleted]
[deleted]
mistborn_feruchemist OP t1_j9fwg6u wrote
Reply to comment by Sirisian in When will virtual reality tech be as good as in Ready Player one? by mistborn_feruchemist
I c . Good . I will buy one in a few yrs then
Sirisian t1_j9fwc8f wrote
Reply to comment by mistborn_feruchemist in When will virtual reality tech be as good as in Ready Player one? by mistborn_feruchemist
VR headsets have had custom inserts for years now. Also ones like the Quest 2 and such work fine with glasses.
BetterButter_91 t1_j9fw0f6 wrote
Reply to Would the most sentient ai ever actually experience emotion or does it just think it is? Is the thinking strong enough to effectively be emotion? by wonderingandthinking
Do we actually experience emotion, or do we just think we are?
duckduckohno t1_j9fvod0 wrote
Reply to comment by Hornman84 in Starlink’s “Global Roaming” promises worldwide access for $200 a month by ethereal3xp
"You too can help a child, with the gift of the internet, for just the cost of a cup of Starbucks coffee a day. "
zshinabargar t1_j9fv39u wrote
Reply to Would the most sentient ai ever actually experience emotion or does it just think it is? Is the thinking strong enough to effectively be emotion? by wonderingandthinking
Do YOU experience emotion, or do you just think you do? Is there effectively a difference?
mistborn_feruchemist OP t1_j9fuifs wrote
Reply to comment by [deleted] in When will virtual reality tech be as good as in Ready Player one? by mistborn_feruchemist
Shit . I wear glasses myself, i only now realised i can't use vr headsets . Hmmm damn. I was really looking forward to vr but it seems unlikely that it will become better from what u said
BendingGhost t1_j9fufvz wrote
Depends on who you ask, we can make predictions all day. Right now tech companies are scrambling to be the first to come out with something that can be integrated into daily life, similar to smartphones. but vr is just too new for it to reach the level of quality seen in fiction anytime soon. I don’t think it’s impossible but it’s gonna be a long time before it reaches that level, no way to pin point an exact year. Even if such technology did come into existence, it would probably be a while before it gets released for the public to use, and even then it’ll most likely be too expensive for the average person.
[deleted] t1_j9fu7sg wrote
[removed]
[deleted] t1_j9fu56y wrote
[removed]
Bewaretheicespiders t1_j9fu52f wrote
Reply to comment by btran935 in How good the US will be for living in future for those who will be earning decent?? by [deleted]
Reddit's "left leaning subs" are a cesspool of misinformation and idiocy.
jfk_sfa t1_j9ftzt3 wrote
Reply to comment by set-271 in Starlink’s “Global Roaming” promises worldwide access for $200 a month by ethereal3xp
But you still want to stream some movies and shows every now an then. Might as well put that media room on the yacht to use.
JC_in_KC t1_j9ftmwi wrote
Reply to comment by YoghurtDull1466 in What about the jobs ChatGPT could create? by Ok-Cartoonist5349
printing press operators used to make bank too lol
Eclipsetragg t1_j9ftg4d wrote
Reply to How good the US will be for living in future for those who will be earning decent?? by [deleted]
I am nearly 100% confident that USA will stay a democratic Republic.
Also for all the people in the comments yelling "Lobbyists" I have a question for you.
Can you name a single time the congress has passed a law that the voter base did not want but the corporations did?
Corporate Lobbying does not seem to outweigh voter interests in my perception but I would like to be shown otherwise if possible.
[deleted] t1_j9g322r wrote
Reply to Scientists make stunning discovery, find new protein activity in telomeres by NadiyaJeba
[removed]