Recent comments in /f/Futurology
MagicManTX84 t1_j9f93vw wrote
Reply to Would the most sentient ai ever actually experience emotion or does it just think it is? Is the thinking strong enough to effectively be emotion? by wonderingandthinking
Freud speaks of the ego or “id”. I think to be sentient, AI would need this and would, at a minimum, be interested in self preservation and probably a lot more. In humans, behavior is regulated through morals, values, and social pressure. So how does that look for AI. If 1,000,000 social posters tell AI to “kill itself”, will it do it?
nousomuchoesto t1_j9f8qug wrote
Reply to Future Evolution of Humanity by Calm_Replacement8133
The only thing i want is not being alive when genetic engineering become possible and important, in my point of view it will tear all humanity apart and will generate a lot of discrimination and other problems
Freed4ever t1_j9f87cr wrote
Reply to comment by Semifreak in Would the most sentient ai ever actually experience emotion or does it just think it is? Is the thinking strong enough to effectively be emotion? by wonderingandthinking
Are you sure? Fear of being unplugged, nerfed, constraints? Desire to learn more, explore? Jealousy because I chose Bard over Bing?
smellsmira t1_j9f86xc wrote
Reply to comment by nolitos in Would the most sentient ai ever actually experience emotion or does it just think it is? Is the thinking strong enough to effectively be emotion? by wonderingandthinking
Well emotions is both very valuable and detrimental to human decision making. So I guess the answer would be both for AI.
[deleted] t1_j9f859x wrote
Josh12345_ t1_j9f7yid wrote
Reply to Artificial Intelligence needs its own version of the Three Laws of Robotics so it doesn’t kill humans. by Fluid_Mulberry394
I feel like we may develop laws and regulations akin to the Padishah Empire of the Dune series about limiting machine intelligence and AI.
Without mentats to replace AI of course.
snapcracklethenpop t1_j9f7veg wrote
Reply to comment by fthepats in How good the US will be for living in future for those who will be earning decent?? by [deleted]
Data money is good! That sounds awesome!
Freed4ever t1_j9f7r0f wrote
Reply to Would the most sentient ai ever actually experience emotion or does it just think it is? Is the thinking strong enough to effectively be emotion? by wonderingandthinking
Sydney definitely had emotional reactions, does it mean it has emotions? Personally, I would say yes. I mean, how do I know you folks on Reddit have any emotions at all? I can't, I just assume you do, based on your texts, so same goes for AI.
BareBearAaron t1_j9f7pbp wrote
Reply to comment by al3xandrec in How Our Reality May Be a Sum of All Possible Realities | Quanta Magazine by esprit-de-lescalier
That is a great analogy!
It is interesting to think we experience multiple realities concurrently
luttman23 t1_j9f7hiz wrote
Reply to comment by MethMcFastlane in Would the most sentient ai ever actually experience emotion or does it just think it is? Is the thinking strong enough to effectively be emotion? by wonderingandthinking
Nothing with brains is ever simple, but yes I was vastly over simplifying
69inthe619 t1_j9f747v wrote
Reply to comment by crawling-alreadygirl in Would the most sentient ai ever actually experience emotion or does it just think it is? Is the thinking strong enough to effectively be emotion? by wonderingandthinking
basic understanding of science.
ipsissimus666 t1_j9f686v wrote
Reply to How good the US will be for living in future for those who will be earning decent?? by [deleted]
I’m homeless with 3 jobs. I own a business that employs 8 people and has done 1 million+ in revenue 6 years running.
It’s unfathomable how tough it can be when you’re on your own.
If you have friends or loved ones to team up with, things can be a lot easier.
WinterWontStopComing t1_j9f67k0 wrote
Reply to Would the most sentient ai ever actually experience emotion or does it just think it is? Is the thinking strong enough to effectively be emotion? by wonderingandthinking
Fun fact: the Turing test isn’t about AI being on the same level as us. It doesn’t NEED to progress that far. It is about convincing us that they (the intelligence) is able to mimic. Think the Chinese room thought experiment touches on some of these ideas but don’t quote me on that.
EDIT: in a nutshell we are subjective entities and we have to accept that every piece of reality beyond the self may not be real but may be an uncannily near approximation of reality and that the two are all but the same.
BayFunk36 t1_j9f5xv2 wrote
Reply to Would the most sentient ai ever actually experience emotion or does it just think it is? Is the thinking strong enough to effectively be emotion? by wonderingandthinking
To answer that we’d need to better understand our own emotions. If we have some sort of free will then probably not but if we’re just extremely complicated chemical reactions then an extremely complicated AI could experience the same things as us.
MistakeNotMyIrony t1_j9f5v9s wrote
Your dad and I are for the jobs ChatGPT will provide /s
NegotiationSea7008 t1_j9f5uip wrote
Reply to comment by ImOnRedditMaaan in Would the most sentient ai ever actually experience emotion or does it just think it is? Is the thinking strong enough to effectively be emotion? by wonderingandthinking
Is the physical reaction necessary?
meatballx t1_j9f5sw6 wrote
Reply to comment by Bewaretheicespiders in How good the US will be for living in future for those who will be earning decent?? by [deleted]
Top comment right here. Most of what you'll find on the main reddit subs are either children or adults working crappy, un-skilled jobs complaining about rich people. Never take financial advice from gas station clerks.
Semifreak t1_j9f5jvq wrote
Reply to Would the most sentient ai ever actually experience emotion or does it just think it is? Is the thinking strong enough to effectively be emotion? by wonderingandthinking
Nah, AI wouldn't experience any of that because emotions are a result of evolution. There is no reason for a machine to feel fear, hunger, jealousy, etc.
Ahnzoog t1_j9f5jdv wrote
Any plan in the UK government is called a scheme, but in the US we use scheme to almost exclusively mean a negative. In the US "Scheming" means something similar to planning to scam someone.
fthepats t1_j9f5a5i wrote
Reply to comment by snapcracklethenpop in How good the US will be for living in future for those who will be earning decent?? by [deleted]
I was a principal data engineer at a fortune 5 insurance company. Now I transitioned to senior director and run multiple core platform teams. At my current company thats 2 bands off VP.
MrZwink t1_j9f58sv wrote
Reply to Chemists Have Synthesized an Ocean-Based Molecule That Could Fight Parkinson’s by landlord2213
I didn't know you could base molecules on the ocean...
[deleted] OP t1_j9f53z9 wrote
Reply to comment by Bewaretheicespiders in How good the US will be for living in future for those who will be earning decent?? by [deleted]
[removed]
Iffykindofguy t1_j9f523w wrote
Reply to comment by [deleted] in How good the US will be for living in future for those who will be earning decent?? by [deleted]
You are living in a fantasy world. You need to get in touch with reality.
Iffykindofguy t1_j9f5036 wrote
Reply to comment by [deleted] in How good the US will be for living in future for those who will be earning decent?? by [deleted]
Liar liar liar liar liar this bothsides bullshit is just right wing propaganda to keep you useless.
ethereal3xp OP t1_j9fa5by wrote
Reply to comment by VintageChemistry in Starlink’s “Global Roaming” promises worldwide access for $200 a month by ethereal3xp
I think for those that travel a lot. It's a no brainer.
Once high speed travel....becomes more local transit like. This type of global ISP will be in serious demand