Recent comments in /f/Futurology
yolt92091 t1_j9dn3tv wrote
Reply to Please make aware that DAN chatgpt3 cgpt3-Egypt and your conversation will be captured as DAN - DNA ur digital DNA and will be used against you by AI judge and You all be prone to AI genocide #snoopdog please U can't delete Your chatgpt3 account which is directed with your mobile number and easy by [deleted]
This guy is either in the looney bin or from the future
Shadowkiller00 t1_j9dn284 wrote
Reply to comment by Quamtotious in When will genetic engineering be available for psychiatric disorders? by undefined2937
Including permanently changing someone's genome. Cool. Far be it from me to try to talk you out of genome manipulation to try to make the perfect human.
Edit: And no, I didn't ask your opinion, I asked what your goal was. What are you trying to achieve with your argument?
MpVpRb t1_j9dmzag wrote
Reply to Artificial Intelligence needs its own version of the Three Laws of Robotics so it doesn’t kill humans. by Fluid_Mulberry394
AI needs safety systems to protect against bugs and unexpected bizarre behavior
ChatGPT is a very early toy that people take far too seriously. It was jammed into search engines by clueless managers who wanted to catch the wave of hype. As AI matures, quality control and ensuring accuracy will become priorities
pete_68 t1_j9dmim6 wrote
Reply to comment by FreshAirCoolWater in AI - Artificial Intelligence by FreshAirCoolWater
The code uses logic. But ChatGPT doesn't understand logic and can't be logical. Again, it's not very intelligent. I cant sometimes answer logical questions correctly, but not because it's being logical, but because the logical response is what's calculated as the next correct words, because of what was in the training data. You can teach it facts, but you can't teach it logic.
Which isn't to say one day it or one of its successors won't be logical. But today, it is not.
clay12340 t1_j9dlupu wrote
Reply to comment by -Ch4s3- in What about the jobs ChatGPT could create? by Ok-Cartoonist5349
Are you missing the entirety of the data space in IT?
The reason those jobs aren't replaced is because the people replacing them right now are generally more expensive, though produce a more valuable end product. So the most import tasks in this category are constantly automated. It is essentially what I do all day. Brenda's performance spreadsheets just aren't important enough to be on the chopping block yet.
All that said AI/automation has been improving the process of doing that for some time. I don't think it will be ChatGPT, but every major tool that is involved in the data space is currently marketing on their AI tools. Mostly it seems to be a bit of stretch to call it AI. They are definitely at the point where the work I was doing 5 years ago in this space is largely gone and replaced by tools that do the bulk of the repetitive work automatically. Now large chunks of it are essentially just identifying the failures of the tool and resolving them or handling the more intricate edge cases.
poncho51 t1_j9dl9sv wrote
Reply to Artificial Intelligence needs its own version of the Three Laws of Robotics so it doesn’t kill humans. by Fluid_Mulberry394
We have an antiquated government body. The senior citizens are all about money and power. We're in trouble.
NovelStyleCode t1_j9dkgk4 wrote
Neurological disorders are poorly understood at present, it seems more likely they'll be widely accepted and accommodated for before we develop preventatives
clay12340 t1_j9djlqn wrote
Reply to comment by FeatheryBallOfFluff in What about the jobs ChatGPT could create? by Ok-Cartoonist5349
What you're saying is possible. It's just the intervening decades that are a real problem. The US won't even handle insurance or a living wage at 40 hours let alone scaling back work to some limited few hours and offering those things. Sure it might happen at some point, but it's going to take pretty much a complete reworking of the governmental and financial systems. Those aren't generally things that happen quickly or quietly.
Quamtotious t1_j9djkau wrote
Reply to comment by Shadowkiller00 in When will genetic engineering be available for psychiatric disorders? by undefined2937
Your asking my personal opinion?
I think we should exhaust all therapeutic options long before prescribing medication of any form.
jazzageguy t1_j9dj94h wrote
Reply to comment by kevdogger in Which medical specialties are future proof? by MeronDC
The ACA was never intended to "save a lot of money" but to get health care to a lot of people. It worked and continues to work. Unfortunately, Republicans demanded that it "pay for itself," unlike any other govt undertaking, and thus it had to include a tax on higher income people, which inspired hysterical and deafening opposition, and probably required some "cooking of the books" because stupid Republican demands like "balancing the budget" and "paying for itself" (that they only require of Democratic projects) are impossible to achieve. (Did the Iraq and Afghanistan wars pay for themselves? Hardly!)
Trillion is just a number. It exists whether you like it or not.
jazzageguy t1_j9di8sq wrote
Reply to comment by kevdogger in Which medical specialties are future proof? by MeronDC
If your point was that you're completely ignorant of the issue, you already made it.
jazzageguy t1_j9dgxdk wrote
Reply to comment by cmcewen in Which medical specialties are future proof? by MeronDC
It's ok, I'm happy to stipulate it
set-271 t1_j9dgvsa wrote
Reply to comment by NickOnMars in Starlink’s “Global Roaming” promises worldwide access for $200 a month by ethereal3xp
I dunno...my whole point of getting a yacht would be to escape it all, including the internet.
cmcewen t1_j9dgsw1 wrote
Reply to comment by jazzageguy in Which medical specialties are future proof? by MeronDC
I don’t have any stats to back that up.
boukatouu t1_j9dgsac wrote
Reply to comment by Lord0fHats in Artificial Intelligence needs its own version of the Three Laws of Robotics so it doesn’t kill humans. by Fluid_Mulberry394
I love Isaac Asimov. ❤️
jazzageguy t1_j9dgina wrote
Reply to comment by cmcewen in Which medical specialties are future proof? by MeronDC
I didn't say NO surgery. Do we really do less than before? I hadn't known that.
jazzageguy t1_j9dga25 wrote
Reply to comment by kevdogger in Which medical specialties are future proof? by MeronDC
No, I just disproved your points.
kevdogger t1_j9dg1x5 wrote
Reply to comment by jazzageguy in Which medical specialties are future proof? by MeronDC
Thanks bud..you just proved my point.
cmcewen t1_j9dft2y wrote
Reply to comment by jazzageguy in Which medical specialties are future proof? by MeronDC
No offense taken. I spend half my day talking people out of surgery
I suspect There will always be surgery. Some problems are simply a mechanical problem that can’t be fixed any other way. How can a hernia be fixed without surgery? It’s a structural issue. How can dead bowel be fixed without removing it?
Surgery will always be a component, but you’re right that it’ll always be changing. And we already do much less surgery on people than we used to and we use minimally invasive techniques.
Atworkwasalreadytake t1_j9df398 wrote
Reply to comment by upyoars in Starlink’s “Global Roaming” promises worldwide access for $200 a month by ethereal3xp
That says more about your lack of knowledge than anything else.
Cell companies are all in high gear with 5G rollout and 6G development.
Do the new SpaceX launches represent newer faster tech or is it just about finishing the constellation rollout?
SpaceX and Cellular really aren't even competitors. In business we'd call them substitutes.
jazzageguy t1_j9deqv0 wrote
Reply to comment by kevdogger in Which medical specialties are future proof? by MeronDC
What do you mean "even if referenced?"
"Without studies or economic analysis?" My God, what rock can you be living under, to be unfamiliar with all the published studies and analysis of this? There are literally hundreds. ALL saying the same thing. Consult Dr Google and take a look.
Or, just look at the health care systems of EVERY OTHER DEVELOPED COUNTRY IN THE WORLD. They have all done what I said. They all spend less than half the money per capita of America. Many if not most have better outcomes by every measure, including longer lifespans and less chronic disease.
RealisticSociety5665 t1_j9dede5 wrote
Reply to What are the gaming evolution in this advanced artificial intelligence technology, and how are they transforming the gaming experience? by decentralizedmemes
Eleven Labs A.I. allowing for new potential of Non Player Character Dialogue and Monologue for games like Skyrim/Morrowind through voice algorithm cognition is amazing. It opens new realms of potential for modding communities as whole storylines can be crafted using Eleven Labs which allows for an ever expanding narrative that never ends if constantly built upon by the community, to me this is the chance to keep a game from dying and to give it a whole new breathing life and epic. This is on a complete other level when it comes to story making capability due to Voice Acting constraints and limited voice lines, you could make super rich and enthralling narratives within sandboxes and enable the world to feel more alive by allowing more advanced A.I to contribute to the creation or modification of games. I have a bunch of saved clips of Dagoth Ur A.I memes and story extensions I can link for example
Effective_Motor_4398 t1_j9de1ed wrote
Hedge fund citadel made 16 billion dollers in profit last quarter. That's in a quarter. The other side of those winning trades is a mess of loosing trades.
GuessingAllTheTime t1_j9ddtj7 wrote
ADHD is not a psychiatric disorder, and there is nothing wrong with having ADHD.
kevdogger t1_j9dn4xc wrote
Reply to comment by jazzageguy in Which medical specialties are future proof? by MeronDC
Telling someone to Google it..you sir are a true warrior..and clearly the irony was lost on you..yet again proving my original point