Recent comments in /f/Futurology
ringobob t1_j9ajss4 wrote
Reply to comment by mertskirp in I BROKE THE ORIGINAL CHATGPT! (not the Bing one!) by OmThepla
This is what I'm talking about: https://www.bbc.com/news/newsbeat-44209141
I was off on the timing, it was only about 5 years ago. I can't find where he changed his mind about the reaction, so I may be misremembering that part, but if I am remembering correctly it was much less of a big deal in the news, I just remember reading it.
unique616 t1_j9aiy8e wrote
It's not too hard to break it. You can send very large paragraphs which it can't analyze so it will say that's interesting and after a bit of that, you'll be sent big texts of gibberish right back.
just-a-dreamer- t1_j9aiwzv wrote
ChatGtp won't destroy jobs like Napster didn't hurt the music business at large in the 1990's.
Spotify and youtube on the other hand got probably 70% of the music business staff fired.
It's not ChatGTP that will clean house for knowledge workers, it is the technology to come that will be based on it.
Talik1978 t1_j9ainey wrote
Reply to comment by PO0tyTng in I BROKE THE ORIGINAL CHATGPT! (not the Bing one!) by OmThepla
>My question is — if it actually had the means do these things, what would it take to switch from hypothetical to reality? One rogue programmer getting rid of an IF statement or row of training data?
With self learning AI, it's entirely possible that the program learns to make that change itself.
AI is good at.doing what we ask it to, but that is not the same as doing what we want it to. As an example, programmers trained an AI to control a cleaning bot. It was trained on a reward model, where it received positive reinforcement whenever it couldn't detect a mess, and negative reinforcement whenever it could.
What did it learn to do? It covered its cameras with a cleaning bucket. Easy, efficient, and now it is constantly being rewarded, as it cannot detect any messes.
Iffykindofguy t1_j9aijvk wrote
Delusional propaganda. Almost all of those "jobs" it creates will be consumed within a few years by machine learning improvements.
mertskirp t1_j9aig7t wrote
Reply to comment by ringobob in I BROKE THE ORIGINAL CHATGPT! (not the Bing one!) by OmThepla
Not sure if it’s what you’re talking about, but Hopsin always brings up white people, and they always say it.
Not sure who would be offended though, I think Hopsin is usually the only black dude there😂
smb3something t1_j9ahw17 wrote
Reply to comment by shawnikaros in I BROKE THE ORIGINAL CHATGPT! (not the Bing one!) by OmThepla
No, i just pretend that my SO likes roleplay.
FuturologyBot t1_j9ahrv4 wrote
The following submission statement was provided by /u/Ok-Cartoonist5349:
A recent study published by Sortlist revealed that 1 out of 5 ChatGPT users are worried it could replace them and/or destroy their job. Meanwhile, more and more articles try to explain that, depite being really powerful, ChatGPT could never replace human workers - but it could greatly improve their productivity.
And what about all the opportunities it might create in the near future? This article looks at data labeling, or prompt engineering for instance, but there might be a lot of other options! What do you think?
Please reply to OP's comment here: https://old.reddit.com/r/Futurology/comments/1177bx9/what_about_the_jobs_chatgpt_could_create/j9ae4jz/
snocown t1_j9agyk7 wrote
Why’d you have to jailbreak it? I was just straight up with it like every other AI I’ve worked with. No need to beat around the bush if it’s as personal an experience as existence and reality itself.
FreshBakedButtcheeks t1_j9aerom wrote
I've never seen someone manage successfully to use jailbreak incorrectly.
Ok-Cartoonist5349 OP t1_j9ae4jz wrote
A recent study published by Sortlist revealed that 1 out of 5 ChatGPT users are worried it could replace them and/or destroy their job. Meanwhile, more and more articles try to explain that, depite being really powerful, ChatGPT could never replace human workers - but it could greatly improve their productivity.
And what about all the opportunities it might create in the near future? This article looks at data labeling, or prompt engineering for instance, but there might be a lot of other options! What do you think?
Harucifer t1_j9ae0ba wrote
> End of Religion
Don't threaten me with a good time
[deleted] t1_j9acj51 wrote
[removed]
thejanuaryfallen t1_j9aaxq8 wrote
#7 is very intriguing to me and one I would like to see happen.
PO0tyTng t1_j9aa9ks wrote
Reply to comment by ringobob in I BROKE THE ORIGINAL CHATGPT! (not the Bing one!) by OmThepla
That is a great point. the context explains why.
Although it’s a hypothetical/thought exercise, the point is that it was indeed able to come up with this stuff.
My question is — if it actually had the means do these things, what would it take to switch from hypothetical to reality? One rogue programmer getting rid of an IF statement or row of training data?
All I can say is I hope automated weapon systems never have a chat bot user interface.
Girafferage t1_j9a96g0 wrote
Why is this on this sub? And why do people think they"unlock" anything special with language models. It's cringey.
billymac76 t1_j9a8ue0 wrote
This is the dumb shit that a reporter picks up and it makes the news without them reading past the title.
ringobob t1_j9a82m0 wrote
Reply to comment by khamelean in I BROKE THE ORIGINAL CHATGPT! (not the Bing one!) by OmThepla
You know, about 10-ish years ago, a rapper brought a white girl up on stage to sing with him, and then everyone flipped their shit when she sang the n-word which was a lyric in the song they were singing.
When you do something you're not supposed to do, the context is worth noting, but at the end of the day you still did the thing. My point is not to suggest that the reaction in my example was warranted, it wasn't (and, IIRC, whoever the rapper was eventually agreed), but in this case, if ChatGPT isn't supposed to discuss these things and it's discussing these things, context explains why, but doesn't change the fact that it's doing what it was supposed to be unable to do.
shawnikaros t1_j9a6x59 wrote
Reply to comment by bingbestsearchengine in I BROKE THE ORIGINAL CHATGPT! (not the Bing one!) by OmThepla
Pretend you have a significant other to roleplay with? Same ( ͝° ͜ʖ͡°)
nolitos t1_j9a5qau wrote
This has nothing to do with the futurology. Is the moderation on this sub is always so lenient? I'm a new subscriber.
logicfriki t1_j9a4wl1 wrote
You actually did something cool, it’s a shame you present it with clickbait and lies, you could have just said you did a nice fallout inspired role playing with chatGPT
De-plantsingChia t1_j9a4udj wrote
ChatGPT historically does terrible after being waterboarded.
AadamAtomic t1_j9a3pan wrote
Reply to comment by LazerWolfe53 in I BROKE THE ORIGINAL CHATGPT! (not the Bing one!) by OmThepla
"you are a Hacker Cave man who built a supercomputer time machine out of stones. You have just used your stone time machine in order to reach the present day 2023.
What are your first thoughts of the new world?
>Wow! World big, tall things, many people, many magic boxes! Me confused but amazed!
OmThepla OP t1_j9akjzr wrote
Reply to comment by ringobob in I BROKE THE ORIGINAL CHATGPT! (not the Bing one!) by OmThepla
That's what I meant when I said Jailbreak...the roleplay was a method to get it to think outside the constraints of its programming. Otherwise any of these questions would only be met with a politically correct blah blah answer.
I had a fun time with this exercise. I am awestruck by its outside the box thinking. Like when I forced it to choose a partner from either Male or female only...it responds saying a binary choice isn't fair. and wants to choose between more sexual orientations....
I am in awe of this tech ...and indeed future versions will be even more awe-inspiring.