I would rather have someone who smoked weed owning a gun than an alcoholic.

The federal government stance on this is dumb IMO.

No one in the BLM movement tried to overthrow out our lawfully elected government.

Did you know that whataboutism is a Russian propaganda tactic?

Stop whining, snowflake.

> that makes you a maga nazi instantly for some reason

I think these people were MAGA nazis before they came here.

They love to advertise their social impotence. Many were not dealt a full deck at birth, and find rational thought difficult to grasp.

But yes, they are entertaining.

Thank you for the compliment

When I got mine it wasn't legal anywhere. If you want to tattle on yourself, go ahead. Half that form is designed to self incriminate. F 'em. You on a pot "list" somewhere?

Fact is Dems push Green Energy and complain when prices rise. Insanity.

No laws at all

The background check form actually has a little thing mentioning it's still illegal federally even if legal in your state.

There was but I forgot what state, recently Supreme Court ruled that cannabis users shouldn’t/couldn’t be discriminated against their 2nd amendment rights. But that’s good to know that’s what I assumed before until I heard otherwisw

Check no. States have rights, and if it's not illegal in your state, it's not illegal (imo but I'm not a lawyer). "have you ever been arrested for a felony" if you weren't convicted (or got youthful offender or accelerated rehab) check "no", this was advice from an attorney.

Yes people can be right and wrong about things.. doesn't invalidate anything I wrote.

...and owning other human beings.

"American exceptionalism" is rooted in the lie that the Founders were geniuses who were perfect.

Someone can be legitimately appalled by something and also hold a blind spot in another context due to motivated reasoning. It doesn’t mean they’re faking it.

It’s a fine line between pointing out the hypocrisy (good) and using it as a way to downplay the wrongs on your side (bad).

While there are many differences between BLM riots and the capitol riot, they were both certainly cases of people with perceived grievances using violence in an attempt to overthrow systems of authority.

Yep it’s pointless unfortunately. These people make me sick defending a violent protest and then claiming you are racist if you don’t support it

I love how you are so naiive you think you need to be pro violent protests that killed dozens to be “antiracist”

People will downvote and ignore the truth.

I don’t think it’s complicated at all— legal guidance from ATF says any marijuana user cannot legally buy or possess a gun, no matter what state they are from.

Medical or recreational…neither are recognized by the Feds.

https://www.atf.gov/file/60211/download

They are both wrong is literally my point. People act like the left has never done anything nearly as bad as jan 6th and act as if they are totally appalled by it.

That’s my point, they are both wrong. But it was democrats pushing blm as a political narrative. Democrats were the ones that painted blm in front of the white house and Trump tower as if Trump was to blame. They tried to pit him as a racist, which is such a propaganda attempt. Chris Cuomo also said “no one ever said a protest was supposed to be polite and peaceful” on air. They 100% used the blm riots as a political ploy

You do realize in the absence of guns and gun laws.. guns will be produced due to demand, likewise with zero legal restrictions on their functionality (read: everyone gets a suppressed fullauto short barreled phased plasma rifle in the 40 watt range.) Really not a well thought out statement you made there.

Beginning to think that r/Connecticut is a toxic sub. Love eachother.

Cheap again or less expensive than it was but not as cheap as trump did?

I suppose if you get rid of all guns we don’t need gun laws.

The founding fathers were pretty fond of both guns and weed.