Recent comments in /f/Connecticut

-BruinsBabe- t1_jaex04n wrote

Mange isn’t something animal control would trap and treat, for wild life. You can call an animal rescue group and see if they’ll do it. But, usually, during winter most animals with mange will end up dying. If the animal was healthy to begin with and had a good immune system, it would be able to fight it off. It’s the sickly, injured, too old or too young, the ones that can’t fight it off, that get more sick and end up dying.

2

Prudent-Ball2698 OP t1_jaewyjp wrote

Reply to comment by Prudent-Ball2698 in sex offenders by Prudent-Ball2698

If it's a cute cat tho or a dog or any cute animal, he'll I'd buy you some lunch. Or even if it's your kid, or wife or family, so long as it doesn't cross that boundary, he'll I'd buy you lunch for being a caring guy. If it's pepe the frog, well it better be a good one

0

Aniox t1_jaewr87 wrote

Personally I don’t believe Manchester is that bad overall, but to someone considering moving to the area id also tell them to look at South Windsor, basically same access to all the Manchester benefits (mall, stores, movie theaters area) cause they all border it. I can’t speak for the schools personally but a-lot of my family went and all got into good colleges.

2

Prudent-Ball2698 OP t1_jaewkhw wrote

Yes but so do drug dealers. They dispense what was legally medicine in the early 1900s and it still is to alot of people, esp cannabis and heroin, pills and everything. What you aren't getting is personal choice. It comes down to personal choice. Noone chooses to be sexually assaulted. And if you keep going on this I'd have to guess your probably a sex offender

1

Aviendha00 t1_jaeweg4 wrote

Sorry maybe I wasn’t clear?

I don’t think anyone is suggesting an insurance company is right out going to be able to say they won’t pay for treatment because the patient can choose to die which is cheaper.

My guess is that people believe insurance companies will deny treatment and make up some reason to deny it because they know there is a cheaper option= dying

In general I don’t think this makes sense because insurance companies already deny paying for treatments all the time. Thinking that ‘well you can die’ is an excuse for them doesn’t add up.

1

AquaNines t1_jaewb98 wrote

Idk where you’re going with the foster parents part but in those professions when someone is playing outside the lines it’s usually seen as like a solo act by a person and not as a profession as a whole. HR as a whole profession is not really seen in the best light. I have a professional here who could answer a question I was curious about and well within my rights to ask, why wouldn’t I?

2

Prudent-Ball2698 OP t1_jaew7jf wrote

It's still a murder. So why shouldn't the law charge that as a murder? Whether intentional or not, or if someone was raping your child, and as any man or woman would do, you beat that owrson to death, it is murder. But ad a person I understand it, and would vote not guilty. But hey to each their own. Sex offenders are always better off doing life away from children and women and everyone really

0

5Dprairiedog t1_jaevits wrote

And....dead people don't make drug companies or insurance companies profit. Scroll up for context lol

And when people say "free" they mean there is no direct expense. Like no shit taxes go to fund things. Everything costs money because we have designed it that way. Making record profits for shareholders while a majority of bankruptcies in the US are due to medical bills is immoral. Focus on that instead.

3

Enginerdad t1_jaeunfj wrote

Reply to comment by AquaNines in Adverse weather and work by SecretLadyMe

Of course it's not unheard of, but there are also corrupt doctors, abusive veterinarians, and murdering foster parents. Nobody asks people in those professions if they "feel regretful" about being those things.

3