Recent comments in /f/Connecticut
Schnoobi t1_j92ifa5 wrote
IndicationOver t1_j92idue wrote
Reply to Cellphone service by [deleted]
Only iPhones lol
​
Is this a serious post?
Regallybeagley t1_j92idi4 wrote
Reply to comment by IndicationOver in last night's game dinner by CtForrestEye
Usually potluck dinners look like this..
IndicationOver t1_j92i7en wrote
Reply to comment by Theriggerswife in What are y’all doing tonight? by jacksparrahh
Fuck Amazon, maybe its great for the people addicted to buying junk they don't need I guess.
AdHistorical7107 OP t1_j92i6l3 wrote
Reply to comment by AhbabaOooMaoMao in here's a question regarding gun control by AdHistorical7107
I know how to look up a law license lol. I may have misread that someone was saying you can find out if a lawyer has a gun permit by calling the CT Bar. If police can't do so, my bet is the CT BAR can't either
ijflwe42 t1_j92i57i wrote
Mind your damn business you freak
buried_lede t1_j92hzho wrote
It’s not just CT, there is a federal law protecting privacy. And there is a law preventing the federal government from compiling a national gun registry database. If only the gun lobby got into other civil rights, we might get somewhere. They’re pretty effective at getting what they want
AhbabaOooMaoMao t1_j92hrzv wrote
Reply to comment by Spider_J in here's a question regarding gun control by AdHistorical7107
>Also, just because somebody does not have a permit does not mean they do not have a gun illegally.
I'm having trouble figuring out who you're talking about here. Like, someone with a fancy federal license (FFL)?
Machete521 t1_j92hoqq wrote
Reply to comment by joefoe55 in What are y’all doing tonight? by jacksparrahh
Hell yeah!
IndicationOver t1_j92hodz wrote
Reply to last night's game dinner by CtForrestEye
Its a lot of food but it does not look appealing
Presentation is everything
AhbabaOooMaoMao t1_j92hewq wrote
Reply to comment by TFA-DF8 in here's a question regarding gun control by AdHistorical7107
Can you elaborate on that last sentence?
You mean someone could physically do it, not legally do it; It would be contraband within this state, right?
Prestigious-Tie2049 t1_j92h8zt wrote
Reply to comment by gyokuro in Vernon cannabis shop wins approval by gyokuro
> Zavaleta said he’s been surprised by negative reactions to the move — he expected it to be met with positive reactions because of the Aspergillus testing, which he believes makes the product safer, he said.
> He and Marriott said the new standards protect patient safety.
> “We kept the (1 million per gram) where other states didn't put a cap on the total use for yeast and mold,” Marriott said. “They’ve actually removed the caps on total yeast and mold. So we felt like this was a reasonable change to still protect our patients and provide good product for our patients.”
Seems better than other states to me then.
Though you always do seem to critically misunderstand the articles that you post
AhbabaOooMaoMao t1_j92h4ab wrote
Reply to comment by AdHistorical7107 in here's a question regarding gun control by AdHistorical7107
As a lawyer I'm a little alarmed by what you're saying. You can easily look up who has a law license, here: https://www.jud.ct.gov/attorneyfirminquiry/attorneyfirminquiry.aspx
ThatsALotOfOranges OP t1_j92gnzx wrote
Reply to comment by whateverusayboi in In the newest Puss in Boots movie a character mentions Lyme disease, which is named after the town of Lyme. This implies Connecticut exists in the Shrek universe. by ThatsALotOfOranges
Why would it have the same name though?
AhbabaOooMaoMao t1_j92gnue wrote
Reply to comment by TFA-DF8 in here's a question regarding gun control by AdHistorical7107
>LEO has easy access to info on REGISTERED weapons. Typically sane, sober and moral people are the ones taking their time to register weapons.
If they are typical people, they are only temporarily sane, sober, and moral. True in the strictest sense for everyone that's ever lived.
Rich-Equivalent-1875 t1_j92f1rr wrote
Complain to the cops, we have red flag laws , they know if she has a permit and should act accordingly.
Pvrb80 t1_j92eb1k wrote
Reply to comment by tidymaze in Cellphone service by [deleted]
I’m in Wallingford, I have xfinity, my son’s girlfriend is in Massachusetts and has att no signal either.
Must be the iPhones
elkb0y t1_j92d4o3 wrote
Reply to comment by Regallybeagley in last night's game dinner by CtForrestEye
Wow we’re NO fun
AvogadrosMoleSauce t1_j92crr9 wrote
Reply to comment by Camden_yardbird in In the newest Puss in Boots movie a character mentions Lyme disease, which is named after the town of Lyme. This implies Connecticut exists in the Shrek universe. by ThatsALotOfOranges
So, the northwest corner?
dcabrams t1_j92c70x wrote
Reply to comment by RunnyDischarge in Strange smell in the air? by kittyjoker
GOTCHA!
…dammit.
Joansz t1_j92bo2r wrote
Reply to What are y’all doing tonight? by jacksparrahh
I spent it binging on The Orville on Disney+
Camden_yardbird t1_j92apem wrote
Reply to In the newest Puss in Boots movie a character mentions Lyme disease, which is named after the town of Lyme. This implies Connecticut exists in the Shrek universe. by ThatsALotOfOranges
It's somewhere a few miles past "Far Far Away"
ChodyMcChoderson t1_j92ahsb wrote
Reply to comment by Delicious_Score_551 in Favorite coffee shops in CT? by schlasara
Reread the list, and it’s explained in the edit. It’s canton - giv coffee. Then lists Darien - neat coffee
AhbabaOooMaoMao t1_j929eey wrote
Reply to comment by Bowditch357 in here's a question regarding gun control by AdHistorical7107
>And one last point, if firearms being stolen from legal owners wasn’t an issue, we wouldn’t have laws that require us to report stolen guns within a certain amount of time. But we do have those laws, because believe it or not, it happens more often then you’d think.
Happens all the time. If we had actual responsible gun owners, it wouldn't. That's why I support strict liability for casualties caused by guns, liability that runs with the gun. Bet nobody would let them get stolen then! You want guns? Cool. I want you to be financially responsible for damage caused by your guns.
The unfounded fear is that people would break into houses because they know the owner has a gun. In reality, the exact opposite would be true.
DeskFan203 t1_j92il7w wrote
Reply to comment by IndicationOver in last night's game dinner by CtForrestEye
Lol that's a game dinner for ya