Recent comments in /f/Connecticut

AggRavatedR OP t1_j8nrflu wrote

I just remember the g9verner saying something about a complete rehab. 5 years on the North section, 5 years on the South section. As someone who traverses the bridge daily, it's been 6 years now with very little progress made. I was just curious. Round and round the government goes...lol

1

SnottyTash t1_j8nqqa7 wrote

Furious at the dickheads doing 60 in the left lane, yeah, causing others to have to swerve around in the middle and right lanes to pass them.

I’ll have sympathy for slow drivers complaining on here when I consistently see them cede the left lane for its intended purpose: passing. But that’ll never happen

10

paintball6818 t1_j8nqool wrote

The Baldwin bridge didn’t have adequate capacity so it was decided to build new. Q bridge also didn’t have adequate capacity and had giant holes in the footings so rehab wasn’t an option. Goldstar bridge has the capacity so they chose the cheaper option to rehab it.

1

Supreme_Salt_Lord OP t1_j8nlu18 wrote

Reply to comment by timmahfast in Drivers of the 91 by Supreme_Salt_Lord

I take the merge as soon as i can. Also this the place that has an accident almost everyday. Ive been driving for decades, never had a fender bender. These people maybe even you are the problem. People here drive like they are on meth and it shows.

−6

timmahfast t1_j8nlemh wrote

10-20 feet isn't even one car length. And what are they driving that can speed up that quick? Also,again, why are you waiting that late to merge?!?!?!?!? It's okay to be in denial that you're actually the problem. But please learn from this.

3

OldSchoolAF t1_j8nl20s wrote

The executives are excessively compensated... that's one problem right there. Please tell me how paying high salaries to retain "top talent" has a positive effect to the consumer? Why was it deregulated?

Also... why is it that a few years back the delivery portion of the bill was about 25% but now that we can shop around more it's 50% (substantially reducing the benefit of being able to shop around for generation)

1

Prestigious_Bobcat29 t1_j8nl0b3 wrote

I can’t speak for federal DOT, but I’m sure alternatives were studied and this was deemed the best solution. Could be sub base/coast guard related, could have just been prohibitively expensive. Could have been too difficult to work around all the rail infrastructure surrounding the bridge

1

Supreme_Salt_Lord OP t1_j8nkrwf wrote

Reply to comment by timmahfast in Drivers of the 91 by Supreme_Salt_Lord

Im far ahead of them 10-20feet going about 65-70mph. They speed up to 80-90 trying to beat my merge. ITS INSANE to think you are going to win that. I take the merger and slow down on their ass. They can fuck off and go to another lane.

−10

timmahfast t1_j8nk8x2 wrote

A blinker doesn't give you the right of way. Also if you're waiting that long to get over for your exit then you need to learn to plan ahead. Lastly 10-20 feet is not a reasonable amount of distance to merge infront of a car, you're cutting people off which is why the don't let you merge.

9