Recent comments in /f/CambridgeMA

aclockworkporridge t1_ixfv7rz wrote

These activities are absolutely not rare. They are rarely prosecuted, but they are absolutely not rare. Fuel is a great example, both on a global level and a local one. Every year some local consortium of gas stations gets nailed for price fixing, and almost every industry has a landmark price fixing case that occurred in the last 20 years.

Internet is the current hot button topic in that regard, especially in Cambridge. A duopoly can be just as bad as a monopoly, because all it takes is an off the record game of golf and you've created massive profits with no risk of anti-trust or monopoly crackdown.

1

Ancient_Boner_Forest t1_ixf2m8l wrote

Why do you think that fedex and ups would be engaging in illegal price fixing schemes if it were not for the USPS?

Most companies don’t have a government competitor and these sorts of activities are rare and result in serious penalties.

−1

aclockworkporridge t1_ixey408 wrote

Those are examples of things that were at one time private and have been nationalized for the most part. Aspects are still contracted out, and like you said, grids are privately owned, but much of the work to get rural areas electrified was federally managed.

4

aclockworkporridge t1_ixexxc1 wrote

I also think it's good to note that the Postal service keeps private services from price gouging. Even if it doesn't turn a profit, if forced the leading corporations to compete against a third actor, which prevents them from colluding.

4

Ancient_Boner_Forest t1_ixewnq8 wrote

Total number of deliveries seems like a bad metric consider the vast majority of mail received by people is junk mail that no one wants to begin with.

You may have a point regarding distribution network, I don’t know enough about that.

It would seem it’s not cheaper though. I guess I should have clarified that that was most of what I was curious about.

−1

that_dogs_wilin t1_ixe2cvh wrote

and out of curiosity, I looked up and did some back of the envelope math. If you look instead at GDP per capita, you have ~480B / 5M ~= 95k / person.

That's roughly what this page said (though it's Boston-Camb-Newton), where it's the 6th wealthiest metro area in the country, in that respect.

I know it's not the whole story, though, and safe pharma production is a whole thing.

1

dny6 t1_ixdb0m0 wrote

Well, first — there are people who live there who do enjoy the change. There are also people who hate any change but will possibly change their minds as they get used to it.

Second — these streets belong to the city and are funded and used by all residents of the city. I’m not sure why people live in the city if they can’t accept that.

0