Recent comments in /f/CambridgeMA
Nabs617 t1_ito8qnv wrote
I'm rooting for you and hopefully another like-minded individual. I was happy when I read about Cambridge building out protected lanes on Hampshire, but then I was a half-second from getting doored the very next day. These changes can't wait. The Brattle folks recently tried to stop the lanes citing historical integrity or some mess, and I think our lives matter more than the look of protected lanes.
I'm happy to see Garden become a one way today, but just last week a woman who was 8 months pregnant was hit by a car there. A week can make all the difference. I hope this board doesn't slow down any much needed progress.
ClarkFable t1_ito8859 wrote
Reply to comment by taylorhayward_boston in The NIMBYs are reviving the traffic board to hold up bike lanes by IntelligentCicada363
When you look at the number of commuting trips, biking's percentage is in the single digits. Not too surprising considering winter is a thing around here.
ClarkFable t1_ito7f6e wrote
Reply to comment by crazicus in The NIMBYs are reviving the traffic board to hold up bike lanes by IntelligentCicada363
Sure, but that doesn't mean a unilateral change by Cambridge can do anything about it. That's the difference, and it's an important one.
axeBrowser t1_ito3boj wrote
Reply to comment by taylorhayward_boston in The NIMBYs are reviving the traffic board to hold up bike lanes by IntelligentCicada363
It's not a winner-take-all contest. First, the roads can be shared. Second, every biker is potentially one less car on the road, thus reducing traffic congestion. This is a benefit for auto users. Further, given that biking is a more efficient use of scarce public roadways in its ability to transport more people per hour over short distances, it punches above its weight.
The only serious counter argument against bike lanes is that dedicated bus lanes would be even better if a hard choice must be made between the two.
crazicus t1_ito32w9 wrote
Reply to comment by taylorhayward_boston in The NIMBYs are reviving the traffic board to hold up bike lanes by IntelligentCicada363
As of 2019, 28% drove alone to work vs 7% riding a bike to work. I imagine that the bike share has increased since then since there’s been improvements in the bike network and the pandemic got more people onto bikes as well.
mtmsm t1_ito2su8 wrote
Reply to comment by taylorhayward_boston in The NIMBYs are reviving the traffic board to hold up bike lanes by IntelligentCicada363
This data is pretty old but interesting. Driving has been on the decline, and biking has become a more and more common mode of transportation.
crazicus t1_ito259o wrote
Reply to comment by ClarkFable in The NIMBYs are reviving the traffic board to hold up bike lanes by IntelligentCicada363
It is the same bullshit though, just in each individual town in the region
IntelligentCicada363 OP t1_ito1ywa wrote
Reply to comment by taylorhayward_boston in The NIMBYs are reviving the traffic board to hold up bike lanes by IntelligentCicada363
40% of households in Cambridge don’t own a car — so a significant portion of the population would benefit from increasing access to safe infrastructure
given that statistic and that historically 100% of our road space has been devoted to cars, I’m not really sure the point you’re trying to make, other than to make the tired argument that you and therefore everyone drives a car
IntelligentCicada363 OP t1_ito1rsp wrote
Reply to comment by ClarkFable in The NIMBYs are reviving the traffic board to hold up bike lanes by IntelligentCicada363
Every town has a zoning board
taylorhayward_boston t1_ito11vl wrote
What percentage of the 120,000 people in the city regularly bike and what percentage regularly use a car?
ClarkFable t1_itnx6q6 wrote
"This is the same byllshit that got us in the housing crisis"
No it isn't. Housing shortage is a regional issue, and no amount of unilateral policy making by Cambridge could solve the issue. But that's not to say that Cambridge's zoning policies couldn't use some serious improvements (e.g., the use of historic district boards to try to slow down development, stupid low height limits, etc, and all counterproductive)
SesquipedalianPossum t1_itnseii wrote
Thank you for this post.
vhalros t1_itnpn1t wrote
This does sound like some useless beracracy intended to slow down changes to death. Like, in a city of 120,000 people, is there literally anything you can't find fifty people to sign?
Also, looking at the actual traffic regulations, section 3b, it doesn't seem like the traffic board reviews the things they think it does? They could probably still make a stink though; better to have supportive people on the board.
Hyperbowleeeeeeeeeee t1_itnkk1j wrote
Reply to comment by WaitForItTheMongols in Starbucks in Central Square by vbm-seaside-71
If you're complaining about a small uptick in crime but really believe we're on the edge of the apocalypse, it seems like I'd be wasting my efforts trying to convince you that crime is relatively quite low on a historical basis. I wish you the best of luck in your apocalypse, and maybe I will catch up with you when you emerge from your basement.
killerdio t1_itnhopo wrote
Reply to Starbucks in Central Square by vbm-seaside-71
Have other businesses in central closed for similar reasons, or is this a first?
feedmittens t1_itnff41 wrote
Reply to comment by j33pwrangler in Starbucks in Central Square by vbm-seaside-71
Harvard Square location is reopening where the Curious George store was.
j33pwrangler t1_itndjl5 wrote
Reply to Starbucks in Central Square by vbm-seaside-71
Is the memorial drive Starbucks still closed too? And the one in Harvard square closed a while back.
Maybe SBUX is trying to keep their staff safe from organizing.
meshugganner t1_itnd0ng wrote
Reply to comment by Nabs617 in Starbucks in Central Square by vbm-seaside-71
God damnit.
brian_is_tired t1_itncyyo wrote
Reply to Starbucks in Central Square by vbm-seaside-71
Some of y’all are new to the area and it really shows.
WaitForItTheMongols t1_itn77nv wrote
Reply to comment by Hyperbowleeeeeeeeeee in Starbucks in Central Square by vbm-seaside-71
What makes you so confident about the economic situation stabilizing?
smashey t1_itn4utf wrote
Reply to comment by Hyperbowleeeeeeeeeee in Starbucks in Central Square by vbm-seaside-71
In my experience most of the incidents that would make me never visit Central do not rise to the level of crime, and certainly not crime I'd report to the police.
8sGonnaBeeMay t1_itn27l3 wrote
Reply to comment by vbm-seaside-71 in Starbucks in Central Square by vbm-seaside-71
I know there are a lot of sketchy people in central. But I just walk by quickly. Never stop or look at them. The homeless people who ask for change are nice, in my experience.
Hyperbowleeeeeeeeeee t1_itn2721 wrote
Reply to comment by smashey in Starbucks in Central Square by vbm-seaside-71
Crime in Cambridge has been falling for most of that period until the Pandemic.
Hyperbowleeeeeeeeeee t1_itn1n64 wrote
Reply to comment by WaitForItTheMongols in Starbucks in Central Square by vbm-seaside-71
What is this argument? You think crime picks up momentum as it falls? What on earth? Listen, crime has surely risen since the Pandemic's economic disruption. But I am simply not going to join in on a crime panic on that small relative effect. Things will calm down when the economic situation stabilizes.
[deleted] t1_ito9brr wrote
Reply to comment by desicant in Starbucks in Central Square by vbm-seaside-71
[deleted]