Recent comments in /f/BuyItForLife

WhiteWingedDove- t1_j0o55or wrote

Maybe there is something to what you're saying from a psychological standpoint but microeconomics teaches us that firms are in business to make a profit and that is the overriding principle that guides every decision from the smallest, seemingly insignificant decision to major ones. In reality, every decision is a decision where the "bottom line is at stake."

​

So, ultimately, according the microecon, the decision was made to pursue copyright claims against mom and pops because the firm thought it would boost profits. Probably because they thought they could get some kind of monetary settlement, or more likely (in my opinion), because they thought any press it would bring would be good for sales.

​

And that thought doesn't necessarily have to be true for us to say the profit motive is behind it. Tons of business decisions are made because stakeholders *thought* they would boost profits, but actually ended up losing money.

1

SoItWasYouAllAlong t1_j0o2ph5 wrote

>I don't think a single moral business establishment has ever existed, and if it did, it was quickly run out of business by another that was willing to be more cut throat.

I believe that to be correct, but the conclusion you're drawing from it, to be incorrect. There's also a human factor on the corporate side. In many cases, someone says "Let's call those damn fools and explain to them that they can't just imitate registered trademarks and there are laws against that.' Even in a naturally inhumane corporation, there are still a lot of humane employees, simply because the corporation wants good team players.

The human factor would not be present in the big decisions where the bottom line is at stake. But small daily interactions are a different matter.

0

noslickname t1_j0nyfmy wrote

I think that makes sense - see if it’s a design flaw or a manufacturer defect. My stock pot is maybe a caphlon for target? It was a wedding gift - I’ve upgraded a lot of kitchen stuff over the years but it’s still as food as new. Who would have guessed?

1

joumidovich t1_j0nxsr3 wrote

I've had my Lodge enameled dutch oven for nearly 20 years and it has one small chip on the outside. I love it and use it often. Got it for $10 on clearance at Walmart, and it's been the only pot/pan type item that I've had for so long

9

adj1091 t1_j0nw61o wrote

Even if the materials are chosen correctly, they’re still made in China And in my experience China is hardly ever able to produce material certs that match spec, and US engineers look the other way. By the time you’re asking for certs, millions or billions have been spent, and often product has already been shipped. There’s really no bureaucratic way to unwind the mess that was made way above your pay grade.

1

crysardo OP t1_j0nqna4 wrote

That’s good to know! Maybe it is. And maybe they want to inspect this piece to see why it’s messed up and/or recycle. There seems to be a seam on the interior handle that’s coming apart and the hole is the worst part of it. The rest of the pot is perfect. I had another one of these that lasted 11 years. The handles chipped a few times before it finally chipped on the interior. I loved that pot and expected this one to hold up the same.

6