Recent comments in /f/BuyItForLife

[deleted] t1_iznqih6 wrote

Not really ... the reason we produce crap, is because people grow more desperate to generate enough money for interest payments and to keep up with inflation.

If we traded via gold for instance, there would be no pressure for financial growth. On the contrary, everyone would save, because gold would just grow more and more valuable over time, as we can't print more gold. Deflation.

Anyway ... the current system is about to end ... and I guess WW3 is the chosen excuse by our elite.

So, duck and cover :(

2

AutoModerator t1_iznopyz wrote

Hello /u/Sol_Invictus! Thank you for your submission! The AutoMod thought that your post might be a request type post and has changed the flair accordingly, but if this was wrong feel free to change it back!

I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.

1

clayphish t1_iznoakq wrote

I have a subwoofer by Polk that is a perfect example of garbage. It’s designed with a standby mode and will turn on when the amplifier senses a signal. Well this thing is actually on all the time drawing electricity through 2 crappy capacitors with low tolerances. Over a span of time these capacitors heat too much and eventually fail, leaving the owner to junk the whole thing and start anew.

This thing was designed this way on purpose. If you go online you will see some of the owners who know better will replace these capacitors for less than 5 dollars to bring them back to life.

This is what happens with a lot of devices. They plan them to fail just like this. It’s a racket.

5

Vod_Kanockers2 t1_iznmqmb wrote

I think it could, however that would require a consumer base that actually cared about longevity more than the rush from acquiring the latest greatest shiny thing. Unfortunately that is no longer the world we live in as most of society is more concerned with having the newest thing than buying items that last.

15

Ronnoc527 t1_iznlwnf wrote

Suppose light bulbs cost twice as much but lasted much longer, you would not need to buy them nearly so frequently. Therefore, consumers would spend less money on lightbulbs in a lifetime and the manufacturers would make less money.

Things are often designed to break and force the consumer to purchase new stock. It's known as planned obsolescence.

The only reason to build things to last would be if you cared more about workmanship and pride than economics. While this might be true for individuals, it is almost never true for shareholders and therefore incredibly rare as a company outlook.

45