Therapy?

Not sure why you’d put inanimate objects in priority over the dogs but…here we are. Maybe I’m nuts but when our dogs need out they need out. Not in 5 min, now.

The yelling thing bugs me too—like if you want to speak to me, come to where I am, don’t holler at me from wherever else in the house. My partner did that at first but is respectful about it now.

Kind of seems to me you guys should do some couples counseling and find a better path forward.

Oh yeah, midwesterners have basements though so I am still a little confused.

this is my fave actually, but Modern is my fave new haven pie.

Used to do it just to be safe. Like if I’m a bit below I won’t accidentally go over and break the law

T.J. From recess, I’ve always wondered if adult T.J. Still stayed the same wisecracking and playful adult he always was during the show.

See if they have a recording of their open house presentation from the fall - they addressed most of these questions then. The administration was very nice so you can probably ask directly if there isn’t a recording.

I knew about the egg reason for not eating it. Thank you for the flour info.

That happened to us, too.

The green cooker is still going strong, though!

Almost got bit by a rattlesnake once!

my brother since a zombie apocalypse is his dream to take out his anger

TIL you could drive cars in that game.

A field of satellites floating around earth would agree with you.

[removed]

GPT-3 was released three years ago and it took another three years for GPT-4 so maybe yet another three years. It feels like advancements have been super quick, mere months, but this is not true. They just happened to make the ChatGPT site with conversation tuning soon before GPT-4, but GPT 3 is not "new".

I don't expect some sort of exponential speed here. They're already running into hardware road blocks with GPT-4 and currently probably have their hands full trying to accomplish a GPT-4 Turbo since this is a quite desperate situation. As for exponentials, it looks like resource demand increases exponentially too...

Then there is the political situation as AI awareness is striking. For any progress there needs to be very real financial motives (preferably not overly high running costs) and low political risks. Is that what the horizon looks like today?

Also, there is the question when diminishing returns hit LLM's of this kind. If we're looking at 10x costs once more for a 20% improvement it's probably not going to be deemed justified and rather trying to innovate in the field of exactly how much you can do given a certain parameter size? The Stanford dudes kind of opened some eyes there.

My guess is that the next major advancement will share roughly GPT-4 size.

Came to post exactly this.

Because his only other option was to drop an atomic bomb on Perth, and we all know what happened at Raccoon City.

In the kitchen.

Close to the beers and food, usually a little quieter than living room or backyard or wherever people are hanging out which is better for talkin', and everyone comes by to get drinks and shit, so i get to see everyone, and that's usually where people end up doing shit like pouring shots or playing flip cup or discussing drugs they're trying to keep lowkey, and i don't wanna miss out on those things lol

Metro is a big reason I work from home and my car stays in the garage. I was once caught on a train between archives and Chinatown that caught fire. Haven't really been a fan since.

Idk man as a fairly well seasoned MLE I find their general architecture and scale of their combined models to be fascinating in-and-of itself.

Twitter sucks ass - but this is a beautiful piece of ML Engineering.

Alcohol is the devil. Don’t let it take you. It’s not worth it.

Trash waste of entertainment time manipulative redundant. Spending time doing dailies and fomo you could be playing the thousands of other actual good and rewarding games instead

Currently dealing with. I’ve been polite, firm but kind and I’m not getting anywhere. It’s as if this person stood still in time the last 40+ years and won’t see things any other way. With me at least. Very frustrating

>I wasn't the one who said carbon credits were a tax in air.

I also did not say this. Are you ok?

I'm pretty sure you're now pointing your insults at yourself.

I implied companies are selling air in the form of carbon credits. Wikipedia agrees with me, but I'll concede it's a source that should be edited by you if you don't agree with us. I'm not an expert as you're implying you are. I've deferred to your expertise twice and you had this to say:

>you look liek an absolute moron right now, ya?

People that concede to your expertise are morons? I withdraw my concession at your insistence. Now we're back to square one, companies have started to sell air you breath.

The Princess Bride.

One thing I've seen with these LLMs is that you can prompt them with the classes using sort of a multiple choice style. It would be interesting to experiment with whether this can stabilize the outputs and reduce the amount of out of vocabulary predictions you get