Recent comments

Lined_the_Street t1_jegv49b wrote

It took literally hours before getting an evaluation. By then I had been having my breakdown for so long that I was exhausted and just wanted to sleep. When the guy came out to meet me with me seemed completely disinterested, essentially told me to perform breathing exercises and I'd be fine (I was not fine, I didn't need inpatient care but I did need professional resources), by the end he basically just shrugged and walked away. My family left with nothing to show for it except for a ludicrous bill for basically being told to do something that would do close to nothing

3

johnporkenthusiast t1_jegv37w wrote

May I just say that the user bitee1 is the literal stereotype atheist that gives other atheist bad names, check their account, it’s literally just hating on Christianity, but you know it’s there life she they can enjoy it however they want and when they are in hell they can still enjoy that

−1

LibertyPrimeIsASage t1_jegv36l wrote

Really? I took a training course on giving narcan. They said that if someone is not currently on/addicted to opioids, it should have no perceivable effect on them, so if you have suspicion someone ODed and is unresponsive, give it to them, as worst case scenario it does nothing. I now worth it could make a shock case worse. Obviously this is a niche scenario, but I wonder if that's true.

10

AutoModerator t1_jegv2rz wrote

Hello commentor! In order to encourage our users to participate constructively we have added a tiered system for participation!

If you want to use the letter "o" on this subreddit you need to first get 750 updoots on your comments here!

We are confident that this new change will ensure everyone makes comments that other people like and with this completely removing bad behaviour! Thank you, have a nice day and happy updoot chasing!

I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.

1

hedbryl t1_jegv249 wrote

>there's no right answer

There's a lot of wrong ones, though. If he insists OP pay half of his lifestyle, he's a selfish prick. She should pay what she can afford and not a penny more. Ideally that means he covers the rest, given his income is so much higher, but at minimum it means she's not spending money she doesn't have.

6

urzu_seven t1_jegv1rg wrote

When it comes to defining whether the meaning of a word is valid or not yes, absolutely you can’t have a “stricter” definition because it’s a binary operation. Either the definition is valid or it’s not.

Battery as a single object is a valid definition. It is, to use your language, strictly valid and just as strictly valid as other accepted and used definitions.

You are, ironically, confusing definition of words, with definition of situations.

2