Recent comments

AutoModerator t1_jegsx5a wrote

Reply to comment by [deleted] in TIFU by not getting paid by my boss by ktflower

Hello commentor! In order to encourage our users to participate constructively we have added a tiered system for participation!

If you want to use the letter "e" on this subreddit you need to first get 100 updoots on your comments here!

We are confident that this new change will ensure everyone makes comments that other people like and with this completely removing bad behaviour! Thank you, have a nice day and happy updoot chasing!

I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.

1

OddCoping t1_jegsx2e wrote

Reply to comment by ooonurse in Could CHAT GPT be built into NPCs in video games? Imagine no more dialogue choices & just speaking to NPCs. by Platybear_OG

Yes. And no.

Ai can be more limited and setup for more specific purposes. This is possible with the current GPT-3 architecture with decent results.

But there are two problems:

First is that it needs to be trained and designed in a way that supports this more limited scope, which given most games is beyond the capability of the lore to have enough material to train an ai without the character getting access to information that they shouldn't know while still having enough material to make it coherent without just quoting. And yes, this does include Elder Scrolls. Even with the material, this is a long and expensive process, and usually easier to just code the dialogues you want that they want. Have to remember, it isn't just the AI outputting text, but also understanding players that may not always have the correct vernacular or method of talking.

Second, either the ai needs to connect to a service, which can lead to a variety of issues, or it needs to be run locally. With it being run locally, there are significant hardware requirements that make even a simpler model AI more demanding than what most gamers have access to. To add both the AI and the game in the same computer would make the demands even higher. So, running it as a service is the more viable option. But as a server side thing it has a higher delay, is more subject to moderation, in addition to being a continual cost for the company. Which doesn't bode well when most games as a service don't last a year.

But this is all subject to change. A more specialized ai could have lower requirements and be designed in a way to have both a larger language model with more limited knowledge libraries instead of a singular general knowledge set. A company could develop such a lightweight AI to multiple developers to make it cheaper and more unified.

2

jaffakree83 t1_jegswu3 wrote

Reply to comment by bitee1 in My dollar store popcorn has a bible verse on it. by BurritoSanmartino

>All religious Faith is intellectual dishonesty made into an elite virtue. It is wish thinking.

​

Huge generalization not accounting for the diversity of beliefs and valuesi n religious communities

​

>People who think there is a god have no objective method to read any holy book just like they have no objective method that can be used to say how all the other religions besides their one favorite religion are wrong.

Not accurate, that's the assumption that everyone believes what they read with no critical thinking skills. Many religious people many religious people rely on historical and literary analysis, theological reasoning, and communal traditions to understand their religious texts.

>For people who care about what is true in reality the evidence needs to meet the whole of the claims being made and there are only bad reasons to accept god claims. I care too much that the people who I'm forced to share this planet with hold true in reality beliefs. We do not live in private bubbles, the people who take what are supposedly the most important questions and claim god did it with magic - vote, indoctrinate children and most are in a death cult that make them hate and claim other people not in their cults are sub human.

Not supported by evidence. There are always extremists that hold these views but many others follows scientific reasoning and tolerance and love for others.

>The god believers can't keep their religions to themselves.

Neither can atheists, but religious people don't normally seek out to insult and attack anyone who shares their faith, even if they disagree with it.

>They are also more anti-science/ anti-vax during a pandemic.

You mean the science that turned out to be dead wrong and the vax that wasn't really a vax?

>The religious moderates act as protection for the people who take their not moderate compatible religions seriously and who know their holy books best. Those being more honest to the texts are doing much real-life harm and are trying to take away others legal rights.

We generally don't care what others do with their lives, just when it starts to hit close to home, like showing porn to children and making them question their sexuality, which is what Christians said would happen 10 years ago.

1

Banestar66 t1_jegswc8 wrote

Reply to comment by Unmissed in Barry Goldwater, 1967 by FNTM_309

I know and disagree with all those things. I’m glad he didn’t become president. But he’s on a different planet than Reagan and Buckley. He actually believed in his philosophy however misguided I think it is. Reagan and Buckley were just out to enrich themselves.

I wouldn’t even count Eisenhower as a conservative. He was basically a centrist.

1

AutoModerator t1_jegsw9m wrote

Reply to [WP] The god of war left their violent past behind millenia ago, later finding a new life as a teacher. Some monsters make the mistake of attacking the school they teach at... by Shadrak_Meduson

Welcome to the Prompt! All top-level comments must be a story or poem. Reply here for other comments.

Reminders:

>* No AI-generated reponses 🤖 >* Stories 100 words+. Poems 30+ but include "[Poem]" >* Responses don't have to fulfill every detail >* [RF] and [SP] for stricter titles >* Be civil in any feedback and follow the rules

🆕 New Here? ✏ Writing Help? 📢 News 💬 Discord

I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.

1

Halsti t1_jegsvsy wrote

Reply to Monopoly has a monopoly on Monopoly. by [deleted]

well.. ish. You cannot copyright rules of a game. the name "Monopoly" is trademarked, just like the monopoly man, so no one can make a game called monopoly. so in that way, you are right.

but anyone could make a game that works 100% exactly the same as monopoly. you have to make sure you dont break copyright on anything. so they would have to name it something else, give all the spaces different names, design a new board and write their own version of the rule book, that describes the rules exactly the same, BUT you could make the exact same game, with a different name.

9